the critique of judgement-µÚ3ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
le¡¡¡¡¡¡Hence¡¡it¡¡is¡¡evident¡¡that¡¡a¡¡complex¡¡of¡¡practical¡¡precepts¡¡furnished¡¡by¡¡philosophy¡¡does¡¡not¡¡form¡¡a¡¡special¡¡part¡¡of¡¡philosophy£»¡¡co¡ordinate¡¡with¡¡the¡¡theoretical£»¡¡by¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡its¡¡precepts¡¡being¡¡practical¡for¡¡that¡¡they¡¡might¡¡be£»¡¡notwithstanding¡¡that¡¡their¡¡principles¡¡were¡¡derived¡¡wholly¡¡from¡¡the¡¡theoretical¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡£¨as¡¡technically¡practical¡¡rules£©¡£¡¡But¡¡an¡¡adequate¡¡reason¡¡only¡¡exists¡¡where¡¡their¡¡principle£»¡¡being¡¡in¡¡no¡¡way¡¡borrowed¡¡from¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡nature£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡always¡¡sensibly¡¡conditioned£»¡¡rests¡¡consequently¡¡on¡¡the¡¡supersensible£»¡¡which¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡alone¡¡makes¡¡cognizable¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡its¡¡formal¡¡laws£»¡¡and¡¡where£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡they¡¡are¡¡morally¡practical£»¡¡i¡£¡¡e¡££»¡¡not¡¡merely¡¡precepts¡¡and¡¡its¡¡and¡¡rules¡¡in¡¡this¡¡or¡¡that¡¡interest£»¡¡but¡¡laws¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡all¡¡antecedent¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡ends¡¡or¡¡aims¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡II¡£¡¡The¡¡Realm¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡¡in¡¡General¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡employment¡¡of¡¡our¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡cognition¡¡from¡¡principles£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡it¡¡philosophy£»¡¡is¡¡coextensive¡¡with¡¡the¡¡applicability¡¡of¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡concepts¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Now¡¡a¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡complex¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡to¡¡which¡¡those¡¡concepts¡¡are¡¡referred¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose£»¡¡where¡¡possible£»¡¡of¡¡compassing¡¡their¡¡knowledge£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡made¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡varied¡¡competence¡¡or¡¡incompetence¡¡of¡¡our¡¡faculty¡¡in¡¡that¡¡connection¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Concepts£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡they¡¡are¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡objects¡¡apart¡¡from¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡whether¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡them¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡or¡¡not£»¡¡have¡¡their¡¡field£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡determined¡¡simply¡¡by¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡in¡¡which¡¡their¡¡object¡¡stands¡¡to¡¡our¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡cognition¡¡in¡¡general¡£¡¡The¡¡part¡¡of¡¡this¡¡field¡¡in¡¡which¡¡knowledge¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡for¡¡us¡¡is¡¡a¡¡territory¡¡£¨territorium£©¡¡for¡¡these¡¡concepts¡¡and¡¡the¡¡requisite¡¡cognitive¡¡faculty¡£¡¡The¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡over¡¡which¡¡they¡¡exercise¡¡legislative¡¡authority¡¡is¡¡the¡¡realm¡¡£¨ditio£©¡¡of¡¡these¡¡concepts£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡appropriate¡¡cognitive¡¡faculty¡£¡¡Empirical¡¡concepts¡¡have£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡their¡¡territory£»¡¡doubtless£»¡¡in¡¡nature¡¡as¡¡the¡¡complex¡¡of¡¡all¡¡sensible¡¡objects£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡have¡¡no¡¡realm¡¡£¨only¡¡a¡¡dwelling¡place£»¡¡domicilium£©£»¡¡for£»¡¡although¡¡they¡¡are¡¡formed¡¡according¡¡to¡¡law£»¡¡they¡¡are¡¡not¡¡themselves¡¡legislative£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡rules¡¡founded¡¡on¡¡them¡¡are¡¡empirical¡¡and£»¡¡consequently£»¡¡contingent¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Our¡¡entire¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡cognition¡¡has¡¡two¡¡realms£»¡¡that¡¡of¡¡natural¡¡concepts¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡for¡¡through¡¡both¡¡it¡¡prescribes¡¡laws¡¡a¡¡priori¡£¡¡In¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡this¡¡distinction£»¡¡then£»¡¡philosophy¡¡is¡¡divisible¡¡into¡¡theoretical¡¡and¡¡practical¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡upon¡¡which¡¡its¡¡realm¡¡is¡¡established£»¡¡and¡¡over¡¡which¡¡it¡¡exercises¡¡its¡¡legislative¡¡authority£»¡¡is¡¡still¡¡always¡¡confined¡¡to¡¡the¡¡complex¡¡of¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡all¡¡possible¡¡experience£»¡¡taken¡¡as¡¡no¡¡more¡¡than¡¡mere¡¡phenomena£»¡¡for¡¡otherwise¡¡legislation¡¡by¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡them¡¡is¡¡unthinkable¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡function¡¡of¡¡prescribing¡¡laws¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡concepts¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡is¡¡discharged¡¡by¡¡understanding¡¡and¡¡is¡¡theoretical¡£¡¡That¡¡of¡¡prescribing¡¡laws¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡discharged¡¡by¡¡reason¡¡and¡¡is¡¡merely¡¡practical¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡only¡¡in¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡sphere¡¡that¡¡reason¡¡can¡¡prescribe¡¡laws£»¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡theoretical¡¡knowledge¡¡£¨of¡¡nature£©¡¡it¡¡can¡¡only¡¡£¨as¡¡by¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡advised¡¡in¡¡the¡¡law£©¡¡deduce¡¡from¡¡given¡¡logical¡¡consequences£»¡¡which¡¡still¡¡always¡¡remain¡¡restricted¡¡to¡¡nature¡£¡¡But¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡reverse¡¡this¡¡and¡¡say¡¡that¡¡where¡¡rules¡¡are¡¡practical¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡then¡¡and¡¡there¡¡legislative£»¡¡since¡¡the¡¡rules¡¡might¡¡be¡¡technically¡¡practical¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Understanding¡¡and¡¡reason£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡have¡¡two¡¡distinct¡¡jurisdictions¡¡over¡¡one¡¡and¡¡the¡¡same¡¡territory¡¡of¡¡experience¡£¡¡But¡¡neither¡¡can¡¡interfere¡¡with¡¡the¡¡other¡£¡¡For¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡just¡¡as¡¡little¡¡disturbs¡¡the¡¡legislation¡¡of¡¡nature£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡influences¡¡legislation¡¡through¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡£¡¡That¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡for¡¡us¡¡at¡¡least¡¡to¡¡think¡¡without¡¡contradiction¡¡of¡¡both¡¡these¡¡jurisdictions£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡appropriate¡¡faculties£»¡¡as¡¡co¡existing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡subject£»¡¡was¡¡shown¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Critique¡¡of¡¡Pure¡¡Reason£»¡¡since¡¡it¡¡disposed¡¡of¡¡the¡¡objections¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡side¡¡by¡¡detecting¡¡their¡¡dialectical¡¡illusion¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Still£»¡¡how¡¡does¡¡it¡¡happen¡¡that¡¡these¡¡two¡¡different¡¡realms¡¡do¡¡not¡¡form¡¡one¡¡realm£»¡¡seeing¡¡that£»¡¡while¡¡they¡¡do¡¡not¡¡limit¡¡each¡¡other¡¡in¡¡their¡¡legislation£»¡¡they¡¡continually¡¡do¡¡so¡¡in¡¡their¡¡effects¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sensible¡¡world£¿¡¡The¡¡explanation¡¡lies¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡represents¡¡its¡¡objects¡¡in¡¡intuition¡¡doubtless£»¡¡yet¡¡not¡¡as¡¡things¡¡in¡themselves£»¡¡but¡¡as¡¡mere¡¡phenomena£»¡¡whereas¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡represents¡¡in¡¡its¡¡object¡¡what¡¡is¡¡no¡¡doubt¡¡a¡¡thing¡in¡itself£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡make¡¡it¡¡intuitable£»¡¡and¡¡further¡¡that¡¡neither¡¡the¡¡one¡¡nor¡¡the¡¡other¡¡is¡¡capable£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡of¡¡furnishing¡¡a¡¡theoretical¡¡cognition¡¡of¡¡its¡¡object¡¡£¨or¡¡even¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thinking¡¡subject£©¡¡as¡¡a¡¡thing¡in¡itself£»¡¡or£»¡¡as¡¡this¡¡would¡¡be£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡supersensible¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡which¡¡has¡¡certainly¡¡to¡¡be¡¡introduced¡¡as¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡all¡¡those¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡experience£»¡¡although¡¡it¡¡cannot¡¡itself¡¡ever¡¡be¡¡elevated¡¡or¡¡extended¡¡into¡¡a¡¡cognition¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Our¡¡entire¡¡cognitive¡¡faculty¡¡is£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡presented¡¡with¡¡an¡¡unbounded£»¡¡but£»¡¡also£»¡¡inaccessible¡¡field¡the¡¡field¡¡of¡¡the¡¡supersensible¡in¡¡which¡¡we¡¡seek¡¡in¡¡vain¡¡for¡¡a¡¡territory£»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡which£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡we¡¡can¡¡have¡¡no¡¡realm¡¡for¡¡theoretical¡¡cognition£»¡¡be¡¡it¡¡for¡¡concepts¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡or¡¡of¡¡reason¡£¡¡This¡¡field¡¡we¡¡must¡¡indeed¡¡occupy¡¡with¡¡ideas¡¡in¡¡the¡¡interest¡¡as¡¡well¡¡of¡¡the¡¡theoretical¡¡as¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡employment¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡but£»¡¡in¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡the¡¡laws¡¡arising¡¡from¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡procure¡¡for¡¡these¡¡ideas¡¡any¡¡but¡¡practical¡¡reality£»¡¡which£»¡¡accordingly£»¡¡fails¡¡to¡¡advance¡¡our¡¡theoretical¡¡cognition¡¡one¡¡step¡¡towards¡¡the¡¡supersensible¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Albeit£»¡¡then£»¡¡between¡¡the¡¡realm¡¡of¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡concept£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡sensible£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡realm¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡supersensible£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡great¡¡gulf¡¡fixed£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡pass¡¡from¡¡the¡¡to¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡£¨by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡theoretical¡¡employment¡¡of¡¡reason£©£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡if¡¡they¡¡were¡¡so¡¡many¡¡separate¡¡worlds£»¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡which¡¡is¡¡powerless¡¡to¡¡exercise¡¡influence¡¡on¡¡the¡¡second£º¡¡still¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡is¡¡meant¡¡to¡¡influence¡¡the¡¡former¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡meant¡¡to¡¡actualize¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sensible¡¡world¡¡the¡¡end¡¡proposed¡¡by¡¡its¡¡laws£»¡¡and¡¡nature¡¡must¡¡consequently¡¡also¡¡be¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡being¡¡regarded¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡way¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conformity¡¡to¡¡law¡¡of¡¡its¡¡form¡¡it¡¡at¡¡least¡¡harmonizes¡¡with¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ends¡¡to¡¡be¡¡effectuated¡¡in¡¡it¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡freedom¡£¡¡There¡¡must£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡be¡¡a¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡supersensible¡¡that¡¡lies¡¡at¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡nature£»¡¡with¡¡what¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡contains¡¡in¡¡a¡¡practical¡¡way£»¡¡and¡¡although¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡this¡¡ground¡¡neither¡¡theoretically¡¡nor¡¡practically¡¡attains¡¡to¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡has¡¡no¡¡peculiar¡¡realm¡¡of¡¡its¡¡own£»¡¡still¡¡it¡¡renders¡¡possible¡¡the¡¡transition¡¡from¡¡the¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡one¡¡to¡¡that¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡III¡£¡¡The¡¡Critique¡¡of¡¡Judgement¡¡as¡¡a¡¡means¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡connecting¡¡the¡¡two¡¡Parts¡¡of¡¡Philosophy¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡a¡¡whole¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡critique¡¡which¡¡deals¡¡with¡¡what¡¡our¡¡cognitive¡¡faculties¡¡are¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡yielding¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡has¡¡properly¡¡speaking¡¡no¡¡realm¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡objects£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡doctrine£»¡¡its¡¡sole¡¡business¡¡being¡¡to¡¡investigate¡¡whether£»¡¡having¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡general¡¡bearings¡¡of¡¡our¡¡faculties£»¡¡a¡¡doctrine¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡by¡¡their¡¡means£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡so£»¡¡how¡£¡¡Its¡¡field¡¡extends¡¡to¡¡all¡¡their¡¡pretentions£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡view¡¡to¡¡confining¡¡them¡¡within¡¡their¡¡legitimate¡¡bounds¡£¡¡But¡¡what¡¡is¡¡shut¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡division¡¡of¡¡philosophy¡¡may¡¡still¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡as¡¡a¡¡principal¡¡part¡¡into¡¡the¡¡general¡¡critique¡¡of¡¡our¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡cognition£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡event£»¡¡namely£»¡¡of¡¡its¡¡containing¡¡principles¡¡which¡¡are¡¡not¡¡in¡¡themselves¡¡available¡¡either¡¡for¡¡theoretical¡¡or¡¡practical¡¡employment¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Concepts¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡contain¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡all¡¡theoretical¡¡cognition¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡and¡¡rest£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡saw£»¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡legislative¡¡authority¡¡of¡¡understanding¡£¡¡The¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡contains¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡all¡¡sensuously¡¡unconditioned¡¡practical¡¡precepts¡¡a¡¡priori£»¡¡and¡¡rests¡¡upon¡¡that¡¡of¡¡reason¡£¡¡Both¡¡faculties£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡besides¡¡their¡¡application¡¡in¡¡point¡¡of¡¡logical¡¡form¡¡to¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡whatever¡¡origin£»¡¡have£»¡¡in¡¡addition£»¡¡their¡¡own¡¡peculiar¡¡jurisdiction¡¡in¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡their¡¡content£»¡¡and¡¡so£»¡¡there¡¡being¡¡no¡¡further¡¡£¨a¡¡priori£©¡¡jurisdiction¡¡above¡¡them£»¡¡the¡¡division¡¡of¡¡philosophy¡¡into¡¡theoretical¡¡and¡¡practical