a theologico-political treatise [part iv]-第8章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
succeeded in the office by his legitimate sons。
（17：71） He； as the nearest to God； was the sovereign interpreter of the
Divine laws； he communicated the answers of the Divine oracle to the people；
and entreated God's favour for them。 （72） If； in addition to these
privileges； he had possessed the right of ruling； he would have been neither
more nor less than an absolute monarch； but； in respect to government； he
was only a private citizen： the whole tribe of Levi was so completely
divested of governing rights that it did not even take its share with the
others in the partition of territory。 （73） Moses provided for its support by
inspiring the common people with great reverence for it； as the only tribe
dedicated to God。
（17：74） Further； the army； formed from the remaining twelve tribes； was
commanded to invade the land of Canaan； to divide it into twelve portions；
and to distribute it among the tribes by lot。 （75） For this task twelve
captains were chosen； one from every tribe； and were； together with
Joshua and Eleazar； the high priest； empowered to divide the land into
twelve equal parts； and distribute it by lot。 （76） Joshua was chosen for the
chief command of the army； inasmuch as none but he had the right to consult
God in emergencies； not like Moses； alone in his tent； or in the
tabernacle； but through the high priest； to whom only the answers of God
were revealed。 （77） Furthermore； he was empowered to execute； and cause the
people to obey God's commands； transmitted through the high priests； to
find； and to make use of； means for carrying them out； to choose as many；
army captains as he liked； to make whatever choice he thought best； to
send ambassadors in his own name； and； in short； to have the entire control
of the war。 （78） To his office there was no rightful successor … indeed； the
post was only filled by the direct order of the Deity； on occasions of
public emergency。 （79） In ordinary times； all the management of peace and
war was vested in the captains of the tribes； as I will shortly point out。
（80） Lastly； all men between the ages of twenty and sixty were ordered to
bear arms； and form a citizen army； owing allegiance； not to its general…in…
chief； nor to the high priest； but to Religion and to God。 （81） The army； or
the hosts； were called the army of God； or the hosts of God。 （82） For this
reason God was called by the Hebrews the God of Armies； and the ark of the
covenant was borne in the midst of the army in important battles； when the
safety or destruction of the whole people hung upon the issue； so that the
people might； as it were； see their King among them； and put forth all their
strength。
（17：83） From these directions； left by Moses to his successors； we plainly
see that he chose administrators； rather than despots； to come after him；
for he invested no one with the power of consulting God； where he liked and
alone； consequently； no one had the power possessed by himself of ordaining
and abrogating laws； of deciding on war or peace； of choosing men to fill
offices both religious and secular： all these are the prerogatives of a
sovereign。 （84） The high priest； indeed； had the right of interpreting laws；
and communicating the answers of God； but he could not do so when he liked；
as Moses could； but only when he was asked by the general…in…chief of the
army； the council； or some similar authority。 （85） The general…in…chief and
the council could consult God when they liked； but could only receive His
answers through the high priest； so that the utterances of God； as reported
by the high priest； were not decrees； as they were when reported by Moses；
but only answers； they were accepted by Joshua and the council； and only
then had the force of commands and decrees ｛Like the separation of powers in
the United States of America。｝
（17：86） The high priest； both in the case of Aaron and of his son Eleazar；
was chosen by Moses； nor had anyone； after Moses' death； a right to elect to
the office； which became hereditary 。 （87） The general…in…chief of the army
was also chosen by Moses； and assumed his functions in virtue of the
commands； not of the high priest； but of Moses： indeed； after the death of
Joshua； the high priest did not appoint anyone in his place； and the
captains did not consult God afresh about a general…in…chief； but each
retained Joshua's power in respect to the contingent of his own tribe；
and all retained it collectively； in respect to the whole army。 （88） There
seems to have been no need of a general…in…chief； except when they were
obliged to unite their forces against a common enemy。 （89） This occurred
most frequently during the time of Joshua； when they had no fixed dwelling。
place； and possessed all things in common。 ＇17：7＇ （90） After all the tribes
had gained their territories by right of conquest； and had divided their
allotted gains； they； became separated； having no longer their possessions
in common； so that the need for a single commander ceased； for the
different tribes should be considered rather in the light of confederated
states than of bodies of fellow…citizens。 （91） In respect to their God and
their religion； they； were fellow…citizens； but； in respect to the rights
which one possessed with regard to another； they were only confederated：
they； were； in fact； in much the same position （if one excepts the Temple
common to all） as the United States of the Netherlands ｛or United States of
America｝。 （92） The division of property； held in common is only another
phrase for the possession of his share by each of the owners singly； and the
surrender by the others of their rights over such share。 （93） This is why
Moses elected captains of the tribes … namely； that when the dominion was
divided； each might take care of his own part； consulting God through the
high priest on the affairs of his tribe； ruling over his army； building and
fortifying cities； appointing judges； attacking the enemies of his own
dominion； and having complete control over all civil and military affairs。
（94） He was not bound to acknowledge any superior judge save God
＇Endnote 32＇； or a prophet whom God should expressly send。 （95） If he
departed from the worship of God； the rest of the tribes did not arraign him
as a subject； but attacked him as an enemy。 （95） Of this we have examples in
Scripture。 （96） When Joshua was dead； the children of Israel （not a fresh
general…in…chief） consulted God； it being decided that the tribe of Judah
should be the first to attack its enemies； the tribe in question contracted
a single alliance with the tribe of Simeon； for uniting their forces； and
attacking their common enemy； the rest of the tribes not being included in
the alliance （Judges i：1； 2； 3）。 （97） Each tribe separately made war against
its own enemies； and； according to its pleasure； received them as subjects
or allies； though it had been commanded not to spare them on any conditions；
but to destroy them utterly。 （98） Such disobedience met with reproof from
the rest of the tribes； but did not cause the offending tribe to be
arraigned： it was not considered a sufficient reason for proclaiming a civil
war； or interfering in one another's affairs。 （99） But when the tribe of
Benjamin offended against the others； and so loosened the bonds of peace
that none of the confederated tribes could find refuge within its borders；
they attacked it as an enemy； and gaining the victory over it after three
battles； put to death both guilty and innocent； according to the laws of
war： an act which they subsequently bewailed with tardy repentance。
（17：100） These examples plainly confirm what we have said concerning the
rights of each tribe。 （101） Perhaps we shall be asked who elected the
successors
