the use and need of the life of carrie a. nation-第31章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
liquor selling。 The whole license system of the United States is clearly
illegal and unconstitutional。
Abraham Lincoln interpreted the Constitution right; when he wrote
the Emancipation Proclamation。 The Presidents of the United States
are oath bond to enforce it; and the license to vend intoxicating liquors
as unconstitutional。 Mr。 Roosevelt is violating his oath to allow this
business to continue。 He has the same right and more cause than Abraham
Lincoln to cancel every license; and shut up every brewery and distillery
in the United States。 God says; 〃Woe to the crown of pride; to
the drunkardsYes; this thing at the head of the nation is cursedLook
at the assassinated Presidents; since the license was given by the Republican
Party in 1863。 Lincoln refused to put his name to the bill at
first; but was over persuaded to do so by those parties who said it was
to pay a war debt; and when that was done; the license would be revoked;
but poor; honest Abe Lincoln was not suffered to undo the wrong he
was persuaded to commit。 Every drunkard's wife and drunkard's mother
and child ought to bring suit against the Government; for the durgging;
poisoning and murdering of their loved ones。 A man can recover if his
wife's affections are alienated from him; a person can recover damages
even; if he injures his foot on a defective sidewalkthe inference is clear。
And now let us look at the Legal Status of Joint Smashing。 Let
every lawyer; judge and law…abiding person read carefully the following:
Kansas; true to the doctrines enunciated above; and loyal to the best
welfare of her populace; enacted constitutional prohibition forbidding the
sale of ardent spirits。
Section 14 of the Prohibitory Law reads: 〃It shall be the duty of
all sheriffs and constables; in their respective counties and townships; to
file complaints and make arrests for violation of this act; whenever they
shall be informed of the violation thereof; and any such officer who shall
neglect or refuse to file such complaint or make such arrest; upon being
informed of the omission of such offense; shall be subject to a fine not
exceeding 100; and his office shall be vacant: Providing that no such
officer shall in any event be liable for costs of such prosecution。〃 ;
Hence; it is not necessary that the private citizen drum up evidence;
swear out warrants and prosecute liquor drug…stores and joints。 That
is what officials are elected and paid for and if officers fail to abate
these liquor venders; then the duty devolves back on the patriotic citizen。
This decision of the Supreme Court of the United State;; carried
up from Vermont; Spaulding vs。 Preston; 21 p。 9; towit: 〃If any member
of the body politic instead of putting his property to honest uses;
converts it into an engine to injure the life; liberty; health; morals; peace
or property of others; he can; I apprehend; sustain no action against one
who withholds or destroys his property with the bona fide intention of
preventing injury to himself or others。〃
In Kansas every liquor selling place is not only a declared nuisance;
but a constitutional outlaw。 And in the case from Pennsylvania
where a private individual had abated a nuisance; the court held: 〃We
consider it also well settled; as is claimed by this defendant; that a common
nuisance may be removed; or; in legal language; abated by any individual。
Any man; says Lord Hale; may justify the removal of a common
nuisance; either by land or by Nyater; because every man is concerned in
it。〃
It is not only the privilege of the patriotic citizen to abate a dangerous
nuisance but it is commendable。 Bishop on Criminal Law; paragraph
1081; says: 〃This doctrine (of abatement of a public nuisance by an
individual) is an expression of the better instincts of our natures; which
lead men to watch over and shield one another from harm。〃
〃The buildings; premises and paraphernalia of a nuisance are not
legitimate property and have no rights in law。 Damages cannot be recovered
for their destruction by an individual。 The question of malice does
not enter into the case at all。〃
I Bishop's Criminal Law 828; I Hilliard on Torts; 605。
〃At common law it was always the right of a citizen; without official
authority; to abate a public nuisance; and without waiting to have it
adjudged such by legal tribunal。 His right to do so depended upon the
fact of its being a nuisance。 If be assumed to act upon his own adjudication
that it was; and such adjudication was afterwards shown to be
wrong; he was liable as a wrong…doer for his error; and appropriate damages
could be recovered against him。 This common law right still exists
in full force。 Any citizen; acting either as an individual or as a public
official under the orders of local or municipal authorities; whether such
orders be or be not in pursuance of special legislation or charter provisions;
may abate what the common law deemed a public nuisance。 In
abating it; property may be destroyed; and the owner deprived of it
without trial; without notice and without compensation。 Such destruction
for public safety or health is not a taking of private property for
public uses without compensation; or due process of law; in the sense
of the constitution。 It is simply the prevention of its noxious and unlawful
use; and depends upon the principle that every man must so use his
property as not to injure his neighbors; and that the safety of the public
is the paramount law。 These principles are legal maxims or axioms
essential to the existence of regulated society。 Written constitutions
presuppose them; are subordinate to them; and cannot set them aside。〃
These great principles of civil jurisprudence and popular government
apply alike in every state in the Union。 An eminent jurist; Judge
James Baker; of Evanston; Ill。; formerly a resident of Missouri; gives
his professional opinion of the late crusading by the women there。 He
maintains that it was legal; he points out that the saloons raided; at
Denver and Lathrop; were unlawful and that they were 〃nuisances at
common law。〃 He quotes Illinois law as follows: 〃As the summary
abatement of nuisances is a remedy which has ever existed in the law;
its exercise cannot be regarded as in conflict with constitutional provisions
for the protection of the rights of private property and giving
trial by jury。 Formal legal proceedings and trial by jury are not appropriate
and have never been used in such cases。〃 Judge Baker sums up
the case thus: 〃The women who destroyed such property are not criminals。
They have the same right to abate such common nuisances as men
have to defend their persons or domiciles when unlawfully assailed。 As
the women of that state are denied the right to vote or hold office; I
think they are fully justified; morally and legally; in protecting their
homes;
their families; and themselves from the ravages of these demons of vice
in the summary manner which the law permits。〃
More citations might be given proving the legality of joint smashing
by the crusaders; but the foregoing is ample; for all fairminded; loyal
people。 Had the joint smasher's cases been tried on their merits; not one
would have been convicted of a misdemeaner。 They were arrested; tried;
convicted; imprisoned and fined for disturbing the 〃peace〃 of a common
nuisance; and 〃malicious〃 destruction of rebel paraphernalia。 Their only
intent was against the treasonable liquor traffic。 Had there been no liquor
dispensing there had been no smashing。 This the liquorized courts would
not admit for a moment。 Every ruling was a burlesque on civil law; a
travesty on justice and a contemptible farce。 The whole proceedings
from beginning to end were a miserable outrage。
DECAY AND DECLINE OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC。
Today the country is ringing with the cry of political bribery; boodle
and official corruption; from the highest to the lowest。 The rum traffic
is the principal factor in demoralizing and destroying the dignity; honor
and integrity of civic life。 It is the insidious foe that is hatching and
nursing crime。 Startling complication of statistics; obtained from the
replies of over 1;000 prison governors in