theologico-political treatise p4(神学与政治专题研究4)-第2章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
attain if desire be their only guide （for by the laws of desire each man is
drawn in a different direction）； they must； therefore； most firmly decree
and establish that they will be guided in everything by reason （which
nobody will dare openly to repudiate lest he should be taken for a
madman）； and will restrain any desire which is injurious to a man's fellows；
that they will do to all as they would be done by； and that they will defend
4
… Page 5…
A Theologico…Political Treatise
their neighbour's rights as their own。
（16：26） How such a compact as this should be entered into； how
ratified and established； we will now inquire。
（27） Now it is a universal law of human nature that no one ever
neglects anything which he judges to be good； except with the hope of
gaining a greater good； or from the fear of a greater evil； nor does anyone
endure an evil except for the sake of avoiding a greater evil； or gaining a
greater good。 （28） That is； everyone will； of two goods； choose that which
he thinks the greatest； and； of two evils； that which he thinks the least。 （29）
I say advisedly that which he thinks the greatest or the least； for it does not
necessarily follow that he judges right。 （30） This law is so deeply
implanted in the human mind that it ought to be counted among eternal
truths and axioms。
（16：31） As a necessary consequence of the principle just enunciated；
no one can honestly promise to forego the right which he has over all
things ＇Endnote 26＇； and in general no one will abide by his promises；
unless under the fear of a greater evil； or the hope of a greater good。 （32）
An example will make the matter clearer。 （33） Suppose that a robber
forces me to promise that I will give him my goods at his will and pleasure。
（34） It is plain （inasmuch as my natural right is； as I have shown； co…
extensive with my power） that if I can free myself from this robber by
stratagem； by assenting to his demands； I have the natural right to do so；
and to pretend to accept his conditions。 （35） Or again； suppose I have
genuinely promised someone that for the space of twenty days I will not
taste food or any nourishment； and suppose I afterwards find that was
foolish； and cannot be kept without very great injury to myself； as I am
bound by natural law and right to choose the least of two evils； I have
complete right to break my compact； and act as if my promise had never
been uttered。 （36） I say that I should have perfect natural right to do so；
whether I was actuated by true and evident reason； or whether I was
actuated by mere opinion in thinking I had promised rashly； whether my
reasons were true or false； I should be in fear of a greater evil； which； by
the ordinance of nature； I should strive to avoid by every means in my
power。
5
… Page 6…
A Theologico…Political Treatise
（16：37） We may； therefore； conclude that a compact is only made valid
by its utility； without which it becomes null and void。 （38） It is； therefore；
foolish to ask a man to keep his faith with us for ever； unless we also
endeavour that the violation of the compact we enter into shall involve for
the violator more harm than good。 （39） This consideration should have
very great weight in forming a state。 （40） However； if all men could be
easily led by reason alone； and could recognize what is best and most
useful for a state； there would be no one who would not forswear deceit；
for everyone would keep most religiously to their compact in their desire
for the chief good； namely； the shield and buckler of the commonwealth。
（41） However； it is far from being the case that all men can always be
easily led by reason alone； everyone is drawn away by his pleasure； while
avarice； ambition； envy； hatred； and the like so engross the mind that；
reason has no place therein。 （42） Hence； though men make … promises with
all the appearances of good faith； and agree that they will keep to their
engagement； no one can absolutely rely on another man's promise unless
there is something behind it。 （43） Everyone has by nature a right to act
deceitfully。 and to break his compacts； unless he be restrained by the hope
of some greater good； or the fear of some greater evil。
（16：44） However； as we have shown that the natural right of the
individual is only limited by his power； it is clear that by transferring；
either willingly or under compulsion； this power into the hands of another；
he in so doing necessarily cedes also a part of his right； and further； that
the Sovereign right over all men belongs to him who has sovereign power；
wherewith he can compel men by force； or restrain them by threats of the
universally feared punishment of death； such sovereign right he will retain
only so long as he can maintain his power of enforcing his will； otherwise
he will totter on his throne； and no one who is stronger than he will be
bound unwillingly to obey him。
（16：45） In this manner a society can be formed without any violation
of natural right； and the covenant can always be strictly kept … that is； if
each individual hands over the whole of his power to the body politic； the
latter will then possess sovereign natural right over all things； that is； it
will have sole and unquestioned dominion； and everyone will be bound to
6
… Page 7…
A Theologico…Political Treatise
obey； under pain of the severest punishment。 （46） A body politic of this
kind is called a Democracy； which may be defined as a society which
wields all its power as a whole。 （47） The sovereign power is not restrained
by any laws； but everyone is bound to obey it in all things； such is the state
of things implied when men either tacitly or expressly handed over to it all
their power of self…defence； or in other words； all their right。 （48） For if
they had wished to retain any right for themselves； they ought to have
taken precautions for its defence and preservation； as they have not done
so； and indeed could not have done so without dividing and consequently
ruining the state； they placed themselves absolutely at the mercy of the
sovereign power； and； therefore； having acted （as we have shown） as
reason and necessity demanded； they are obliged to fulfil the commands of
the sovereign power； however absurd these may be； else they will be
public enemies； and will act against reason； which urges the preservation
of the state as a primary duty。 （49） For reason bids us choose the least of
two evils。
（16：50） Furthermore； this danger of submitting absolutely to the
dominion and will of another； is one which may be incurred with a light
heart： for we have shown that sovereigns only possess this right of
imposing their will； so long as they ha
