the six enneads-第8章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


eed　then　to　ask　for　sensation　into　the　bargain？　　　　　Perhaps；　however；　the　theory　is　that　the　good　of　any　state　consists　not　in　the　condition　itself　but　in　the　knowledge　and　perception　of　it。　　　　　But　at　this　rate　the　Good　is　nothing　but　the　mere　sensation；　the　bare　activity　of　the　sentient　life。　And　so　it　will　be　possessed　by　all　that　feel；　no　matter　what。　Perhaps　it　will　be　said　that　two　constituents　are　needed　to　make　up　the　Good；　that　there　must　be　both　feeling　and　a　given　state　felt：　but　how　can　it　be　maintained　that　the　bringing　together　of　two　neutrals　can　produce　the　Good？　　　　　They　will　explain；　possibly；　that　the　state　must　be　a　state　of　Good　and　that　such　a　condition　constitutes　well…being　on　the　discernment　of　that　present　good；　but　then　they　invite　the　question　whether　the　well…being　comes　by　discerning　the　presence　of　the　Good　that　is　there；　or　whether　there　must　further　be　the　double　recognition　that　the　state　is　agreeable　and　that　the　agreeable　state　constitutes　the　Good。　　　　　If　well…being　demands　this　recognition；　it　depends　no　longer　upon　sensation　but　upon　another；　a　higher　faculty；　and　well…being　is　vested　not　in　a　faculty　receptive　of　pleasure　but　in　one　competent　to　discern　that　pleasure　is　the　Good。　　　　　Then　the　cause　of　the　well…being　is　no　longer　pleasure　but　the　faculty　competent　to　pronounce　as　to　pleasure's　value。　Now　a　judging　entity　is　nobler　than　one　that　merely　accepts　a　state：　it　is　a　principle　of　Reason　or　of　Intellection：　pleasure　is　a　state：　the　reasonless　can　never　be　closer　to　the　Good　than　reason　is。　How　can　reason　abdicate　and　declare　nearer　to　good　than　itself　something　lying　in　a　contrary　order？　　　　　No：　those　denying　the　good　of　life　to　the　vegetable　world；　and　those　that　make　it　consist　in　some　precise　quality　of　sensation；　are　in　reality　seeking　a　loftier　well…being　than　they　are　aware　of；　and　setting　their　highest　in　a　more　luminous　phase　of　life。　　　　　Perhaps；　then；　those　are　in　the　right　who　found　happiness　not　on　the　bare　living　or　even　on　sensitive　life　but　on　the　life　of　Reason？　　　　　But　they　must　tell　us　it　should　be　thus　restricted　and　why　precisely　they　make　Reason　an　essential　to　the　happiness　in　a　living　being：　　　　　〃When　you　insist　on　Reason；　is　it　because　Reason　is　resourceful；　swift　to　discern　and　compass　the　primal　needs　of　nature；　or　would　you　demand　it；　even　though　it　were　powerless　in　that　domain？〃　　　　　If　you　call　it　in　as　a　provider；　then　the　reasonless；　equally　with　the　reasoning；　may　possess　happiness　after　their　kind；　as　long　as；　without　any　thought　of　theirs；　nature　supplies　their　wants：　Reason　becomes　a　servant；　there　is　no　longer　any　worth　in　it　for　itself　and　no　worth　in　that　consummation　of　reason　which；　we　hold；　is　virtue。　　　　　If　you　say　that　reason　is　to　be　cherished　for　its　own　sake　and　not　as　supplying　these　human　needs；　you　must　tell　us　what　other　services　it　renders；　what　is　its　proper　nature　and　what　makes　it　the　perfect　thing　it　is。　　　　　For；　on　this　admission；　its　perfection　cannot　reside　in　any　such　planning　and　providing：　its　perfection　will　be　something　quite　different；　something　of　quite　another　class：　Reason　cannot　be　itself　one　of　those　first　needs　of　nature；　it　cannot　even　be　a　cause　of　those　first　needs　of　nature　or　at　all　belong　to　that　order：　it　must　be　nobler　than　any　and　all　of　such　things：　otherwise　it　is　not　easy　to　see　how　we　can　be　asked　to　rate　it　so　highly。　　　　　Until　these　people　light　upon　some　nobler　principle　than　any　at　which　they　still　halt；　they　must　be　left　where　they　are　and　where　they　choose　to　be；　never　understanding　what　the　Good　of　Life　is　to　those　that　can　make　it　theirs；　never　knowing　to　what　kind　of　beings　it　is　accessible。　　　　　What　then　is　happiness？　Let　us　try　basing　it　upon　Life。　　　　　3。　Now　if　we　draw　no　distinction　as　to　kinds　of　life；　everything　that　lives　will　be　capable　of　happiness；　and　those　will　be　effectively　happy　who　possess　that　one　common　gift　of　which　every　living　thing　is　by　nature　receptive。　We　could　not　deny　it　to　the　irrational　whilst　allowing　it　to　the　rational。　If　happiness　were　inherent　in　the　bare　being…alive；　the　common　ground　in　which　the　cause　of　happiness　could　always　take　root　would　be　simply　life。　　　　　Those；　then；　that　set　happiness　not　in　the　mere　living　but　in　the　reasoning　life　seem　to　overlook　the　fact　that　they　are　not　really　making　it　depend　upon　life　at　all：　they　admit　that　this　reasoning　faculty；　round　which　they　centre　happiness；　is　a　property　＇not　the　subject　of　a　property＇：　the　subject；　to　them；　must　be　the　Reasoning…Life　since　it　is　in　this　double　term　that　they　find　the　basis　of　the　happiness：　so　that　they　are　making　it　consist　not　in　life　but　in　a　particular　kind　of　life…　not；　of　course；　a　species　formally　opposite　but；　in　terminology；　standing　as　an　〃earlier〃　to　a　〃later〃　in　the　one　Kind。　　　　　Now　in　common　use　this　word　〃Life〃　embraces　many　forms　which　shade　down　from　primal　to　secondary　and　so　on；　all　massed　under　the　common　term…　life　of　plant　and　life　of　animal…　each　phase　brighter　or　dimmer　than　its　next：　and　so　it　evidently　must　be　with　the　Good…of…Life。　And　if　thing　is　ever　the　image　of　thing；　so　every　Good　must　always　be　the　image　of　a　higher　Good。　　　　　If　mere　Being　is　insufficient；　if　happiness　demands　fulness　of　life；　and　exists；　therefore；　where　nothing　is　lacking　of　all　that　belongs　to　the　idea　of　life；　then　happiness　can　exist　only　in　a　being　that　lives　fully。　　　　　And　such　a　one　will　possess　not　merely　the　good；　but　the　Supreme　Good　if；　that　is　to　say；　in　the　realm　of　existents　the　Supreme　Good　can　be　no　other　than　the　authentically　living；　no　other　than　Life　in　its　greatest　plenitude；　life　in　which　the　good　is　present　as　something　essential　not　as　something　brought　from　without；　a　life　needing　no　foreign　substance　called　in　from　a　foreign　realm；　to　establish　it　in　good。　　　　　For　what　could　be　added　to　the　fullest　life　to　make　it　the　best　life？　If　anyone　should　answer；　〃The　nature　of　Good〃　＇The　Good；　as　a　Divine　Hypostasis＇；　the　reply　would　certainly　be　near　our　thought；　but　we　are　not　seeking　the　Cause　but　the　main　constituent。　　　　　It　has　been　said　more　than　once　that　the　perfect　life　and　the　true　life；　the　essential　life；　is　in　the　Intellectual　Nature　beyond　this　sphere；　and　that　all　other　forms　of　life　are　incomplete；　are　phantoms　of　life；　imperfect；　not　pure；　not　more　truly　life　than　they　are　its　contrary：　here　let　it　be　said　succinctly　that　since　all　living　things　proceed　from　the　one　principle　but　possess　life　in　different　degrees；　this　principle　must　be　the　first　life　and　the　most　complete。　　　　　4。　If；　then；　the　perfect　life　is　within　human　reach；　the　man　attaining　it　attains　happiness：　if　not；　happiness　must　be　made　over　to　the　gods；　for　the　perfect　life　is　for　them　alone。　　　　　But　since　we　hold　that　happiness　is　for　human　beings　too；　we　must　consider　what　this　perfect　life　is。　The　matter　may　be　stated　thus：　　　　　It　has　been　shown　elsewhere　that　man；　when　he　commands　not　merely　the　life　of　sensation　but　also　Reason　and　Authentic　Intellection；　has　realised　the　perfect　life。　　　　　But　are　we　to　picture　this　kind　of　life　as　something　foreign　imported　into　his　nature？　　　　　No：　there　exists　no　single　human　being　that　does　not　either　potentially　or　effectively　possess　this　thing　which　we　hold　to　constitute　happiness。　　　　　But　are　we　to　think　of　man　as　including　this　form　of　life；　the　perfect；　after　the　manner　of　a　partial　constituent　of　his　entire　nature？　　　　　We　say；　rather；　that　while　in　some　men　it　is　present　as　a　mere　portion　of　their　total　being…　in　those；　namely；　that　have　it　potentially…　there　is；　too；　the　man；　already　in　possession　of　true　felicity；　who　is　this　perfection　realized；　who　has　passed　over　into　actual　identification　with　it。　All　else　is　now　mere　clothing　about　the　man；　not　to　be　called　part　of　him　since　it　lies　about　him　unsought；　not　his　because　not　appropriated　to　himself　by　any　act　of　the　will。　　　　　To　the　man　in　this　state；　what　is　the　Good？　　　　　He　himself　by　what　he　has　and　is。　　　　　And　the　author　and　principle　of　what　he　is　and　holds　is　the　Supreme；　which　within　Itself　is　the　Good　but　manifests　Itself　within　the　human　being　after　this　other　mode。　　　　　The　sign　that　this　state　has　been　achieved　is　that　the　man　seeks　nothing　else。　　　　　What　indeed　could　he　be　se