贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > the six enneads >

第79章

the six enneads-第79章

小说: the six enneads 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



der to produce an object of vision。 This same vision is the ultimate purpose of all the acts of the mind and; even further downward; of all sensation; since sensation also is an effort towards knowledge; lower still; Nature; producing similarly its subsequent principle; brings into being the vision and Idea that we know in it。 It is certain; also; that as the Firsts exist in vision all other things must be straining towards the same condition; the starting point is; universally; the goal。     When living things reproduce their Kind; it is that the Reason…Principles within stir them; the procreative act is the expression of a contemplation; a travail towards the creation of many forms; many objects of contemplation; so that the universe may be filled full with Reason…Principles and that contemplation may be; as nearly as possible; endless: to bring anything into being is to produce an Idea…Form and that again is to enrich the universe with contemplation: all the failures; alike in being and in doing; are but the swerving of visionaries from the object of vision: in the end the sorriest craftsman is still a maker of forms; ungracefully。 So Love; too; is vision with the pursuit of Ideal…Form。     8。 From this basis we proceed:     In the advancing stages of Contemplation rising from that in Nature; to that in the Soul and thence again to that in the Intellectual…Principle itself… the object contemplated becomes progressively a more and more intimate possession of the Contemplating Beings; more and more one thing with them; and in the advanced Soul the objects of knowledge; well on the way towards the Intellectual…Principle; are close to identity with their container。     Hence we may conclude that; in the Intellectual…Principle Itself; there is complete identity of Knower and Known; and this not by way of domiciliation; as in the case of even the highest soul; but by Essence; by the fact that; there; no distinction exists between Being and Knowing; we cannot stop at a principle containing separate parts; there must always be a yet higher; a principle above all such diversity。     The Supreme must be an entity in which the two are one; it will; therefore; be a Seeing that lives; not an object of vision like things existing in something other than themselves: what exists in an outside element is some mode of living…thing; it is not the Self…Living。     Now admitting the existence of a living thing that is at once a Thought and its object; it must be a Life distinct from the vegetative or sensitive life or any other life determined by Soul。     In a certain sense no doubt all lives are thoughts… but qualified as thought vegetative; thought sensitive and thought psychic。     What; then; makes them thoughts?     The fact that they are Reason…Principles。 Every life is some form of thought; but of a dwindling clearness like the degrees of life itself。 The first and clearest Life and the first Intelligence are one Being。 The First Life; then; is an Intellection and the next form of Life is the next Intellection and the last form of Life is the last form of Intellection。 Thus every Life; of the order strictly so called; is an Intellection。     But while men may recognize grades in life they reject grade in thought; to them there are thoughts 'full and perfect' and anything else is no thought。     This is simply because they do not seek to establish what Life is。     The essential is to observe that; here again; all reasoning shows that whatever exists is a bye…work of visioning: if; then; the truest Life is such by virtue of an Intellection and is identical with the truest Intellection; then the truest Intellection is a living being; Contemplation and its object constitute a living thing; a Life; two inextricably one。     The duality; thus; is a unity; but how is this unity also a plurality?     The explanation is that in a unity there can be no seeing 'a pure unity has no room for vision and an object'; and in its Contemplation the One is not acting as a Unity; if it were; the Intellectual…Principle cannot exist。 The Highest began as a unity but did not remain as it began; all unknown to itself; it became manifold; it grew; as it were; pregnant: desiring universal possession; it flung itself outward; though it were better had it never known the desire by which a Secondary came into being: it is like a Circle 'in the Idea' which in projection becomes a figure; a surface; a circumference; a centre; a system of radii; of upper and lower segments。 The Whence is the better; the Whither is less good: the Whence is not the same as the Whence…followed…by…a…Whither; the Whence all alone is greater than with the Whither added to it。     The Intellectual…Principle on the other hand was never merely the Principle of an inviolable unity; it was a universal as well and; being so; was the Intellectual…Principle of all things。 Being; thus; all things and the Principle of all; it must essentially include this part of itself 'this element…of…plurality' which is universal and is all things: otherwise; it contains a part which is not Intellectual…Principle: it will be a juxtaposition of non…Intellectuals; a huddled heap waiting to be made over from the mass of things into the Intellectual…Principle!     We conclude that this Being is limitless and that; in all the outflow from it; there is no lessening either in its emanation; since this also is the entire universe; nor in itself; the starting point; since it is no assemblage of parts 'to be diminished by any outgo'。     9。 Clearly a Being of this nature is not the primal existent; there must exist that which transcends it; that Being 'the Absolute'; to which all our discussion has been leading。     In the first place; Plurality is later than Unity。 The Intellectual…Principle is a number '= the expression of a plurality'; and number derives from unity: the source of a number such as this must be the authentically One。 Further; it is the sum of an Intellectual…Being with the object of its Intellection; so that it is a duality; and; given this duality; we must find what exists before it。     What is this?     The Intellectual…Principle taken separately; perhaps?     No: an Intellect is always inseparable from an intelligible object; eliminate the intelligible; and the Intellectual…Principle disappears with it。 If; then; what we are seeking cannot be the Intellectual…Principle but must be something that rejects the duality there present; then the Prior demanded by that duality must be something on the further side of the Intellectual…Principle。     But might it not be the Intelligible object itself?     No: for the Intelligible makes an equally inseparable duality with the Intellectual…Principle。     If; then; neither the Intellectual…Principle nor the Intelligible Object can be the First Existent; what is?     Our answer can only be:     The source of both。     What will This be; under what character can we picture It?     It must be either Intellective or without Intellection: if Intellective it is the Intellectual…Principle; if not; it will be without even knowledge of itself… so that; either way; what is there so august about it?     If we define it as The Good and the wholly simplex; we will; no doubt; be telling the truth; but we will not be giving any certain and lucid account of it as long as we have in mind no entity in which to lodge the conception by which we define it。     Yet: our knowledge of everything else comes by way of our intelligence; our power is that of knowing the intelligible by means of the intelligence: but this Entity transcends all of the intellectual nature; by what direct intuition; then; can it be brought within our grasp?     To this question the answer is that we can know it only in the degree of human faculty: we indicate it by virtue of what in ourselves is like it。     For in us; also; there is something of that Being; nay; nothing; ripe for that participation; can be void of it。     Wherever you be; you have only to range over against this omnipresent Being that in you which is capable of drawing from It; and you have your share in it: imagine a voice sounding over a vast waste of land; and not only over the emptiness alone but over human beings; wherever you be in that great spac

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的