the six enneads-第205章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
constraint where there is no compulsion to obey an extern； and how can any movement towards a good be counted compulsion？ Effort is free once it is towards a fully recognised good； the involuntary is； precisely； motion away from a good and towards the enforced； towards something not recognised as a good； servitude lies in being powerless to move towards one's good； being debarred from the preferred path in a menial obedience。 Hence the shame of slavedom is incurred not when one is held from the hurtful but when the personal good must be yielded in favour of another's。 Further； this objected obedience to the characteristic nature would imply a duality； master and mastered； but an undivided Principle； a simplex Activity； where there can be no difference of potentiality and act； must be free； there can be no thought of 〃action according to the nature；〃 in the sense of any distinction between the being and its efficiency； there where being and act are identical。 Where act is performed neither because of another nor at another's will； there surely is freedom。 Freedom may of course be an inappropriate term： there is something greater here： it is self…disposal in the sense； only； that there is no disposal by the extern； no outside master over the act。 In a principle； act and essence must be free。 No doubt Intellectual…Principle itself is to be referred to a yet higher； but this higher is not extern to it； Intellectual…Principle is within the Good； possessing its own good in virtue of that indwelling； much more will it possess freedom and self…disposal which are sought only for the sake of the good。 Acting towards the good； it must all the more possess self…disposal for by that Act it is directed towards the Principle from which it proceeds； and this its act is self…centred and must entail its very greatest good。 5。 Are we； however； to make freedom and self…disposal exclusive to Intellectual…Principle as engaged in its characteristic Act； Intellectual…Principle unassociated； or do they belong also to soul acting under that guidance and performing act of virtue？ If freedom is to be allowed to soul in its Act； it certainly cannot be allowed in regard to issue； for we are not master of events： if in regard to fine conduct and all inspired by Intellectual…Principle； that may very well be freedom； but is the freedom ours？ Because there is war； we perform some brave feat； how is that our free act since had there been no war it could not have been performed？ So in all cases of fine conduct； there is always some impinging event leading out our quality to show itself in this or that act。 And suppose virtue itself given the choice whether to find occasion for its exercise… war evoking courage； wrong； so that it may establish justice and good order； poverty that it may show independence… or to remain inactive； everything going well； it would choose the peace of inaction； nothing calling for its intervention； just as a physician like Hippocrates would prefer no one to stand in need of his skill。 If thus virtue whose manifestation requires action becomes inevitably a collaborator under compulsion； how can it have untrammelled self…disposal？ Should we； perhaps； distinguish between compulsion in the act and freedom in the preceding will and reasoning？ But in setting freedom in those preceding functions； we imply that virtue has a freedom and self…disposal apart from all act； then we must state what is the reality of the self…disposal attributed to virtue as state or disposition。 Are we to put it that virtue comes in to restore the disordered soul； taming passions and appetites？ In what sense； at that； can we hold our goodness to be our own free act； our fine conduct to be uncompelled？ In that we will and adopt； in that this entry of virtue prepares freedom and self…disposal； ending our slavery to the masters we have been obeying。 If then virtue is； as it were； a second Intellectual…Principle； and heightens the soul to Intellectual quality； then； once more； our freedom is found to lie not in act but in Intellectual…Principle immune from act。 6。 How then did we come to place freedom in the will when we made out free action to be that produced… or as we also indicated； suppressed… at the dictate of will？ If what we have been saying is true and our former statement is consistent with it； the case must stand thus： Virtue and Intellectual…Principle are sovereign and must be held the sole foundation of our self…disposal and freedom； both then are free； Intellectual…Principle is self…confined： Virtue； in its government of the soul which it seeks to lift into goodness； would wish to be free； in so far as it does so it is free and confers freedom； but inevitably experiences and actions are forced upon it by its governance： these it has not planned for； yet when they do arise it will watch still for its sovereignty calling these also to judgement。 Virtue does not follow upon occurrences as a saver of the emperilled； at its discretion it sacrifices a man； it may decree the jettison of life； means； children； country even； it looks to its own high aim and not to the safeguarding of anything lower。 Thus our freedom of act； our self…disposal； must be referred not to the doing； not to the external thing done but to the inner activity； to the Intellection； to virtue's own vision。 So understood； virtue is a mode of Intellectual…Principle； a mode not involving any of the emotions or passions controlled by its reasonings； since such experiences； amenable to morality and discipline； touch closely… we read… on body。 This makes it all the more evident that the unembodied is the free； to this our self…disposal is to be referred； herein lies our will which remains free and self…disposing in spite of any orders which it may necessarily utter to meet the external。 All then that issues from will and is the effect of will is our free action； and in the highest degree all that lies outside of the corporeal is purely within the scope of will； all that will adopts and brings； unimpeded； into existence。 The contemplating Intellect； the first or highest； has self…disposal to the point that its operation is utterly independent； it turns wholly upon itself； its very action is itself； at rest in its good it is without need； complete； and may be said to live to its will； there the will is intellection： it is called will because it expresses the Intellectual…Principle in the willing…phase and； besides； what we know as will imitates this operation taking place within the Intellectual…Principle。 Will strives towards the good which the act of Intellectual…Principle realizes。 Thus that principle holds what will seeks； that good whose attainment makes will identical with Intellection。 But if self…disposal is founded thus on the will aiming at the good； how can it possibly be denied to that principle permanently possessing the good； sole object of the aim？ Any one scrupulous about setting self…disposal so high may find some loftier word。 7。 Soul becomes free when it moves； through Intellectual…Principle； towards The Good； what it does in that spirit is its free act； Intellectual…Principle is free in its own right。 That principle of Good is the sole object of desire and the source of self…disposal to the rest； to soul when it fully attains； to Intellectual…Principle by connate possession。 How then can the sovereign of all that august sequence… the first in place； that to which all else strives to mount； all dependent upon it and taking from it their powers even to this power of self…disposal… how can This be brought under the freedom belonging to you and me； a conception applicable only by violence to Intellectual…Principle itself？ It is rash thinking drawn from another order that would imagine a First Principle to be chance… made what it is； controlled by a manner of being imposed from without； void therefore of freedom or self…disposal； acting or refraining under compulsion。 Such a statement is untrue to its subject and introduces much difficulty； it utterly annuls the principle of freewill with the very conception of our own voluntary action； so that there is no longer any sense in discussion upon these terms； empty names fo
