贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > a study of bible >

第24章

a study of bible-第24章

小说: a study of bible 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




If we speak of singing; we may remember that we sing the hymn of even poor little dwarfed invalid Alexander Pope。 He was born the year Bunyan died; born at cross…purposes with the world。 He could write a bitter satire; like the 〃Dunciad〃; he could give the world The Iliad and The Odyssey in such English that we know them far better than in the Greek of Homer; but in those rare moments when he was at his better self he would write his greater poem; 〃The Messiah〃; in which the movement of Scripture is outlined as it could be only by one who knew the English Bible。 And when we sing

 〃Rise; crowned with light; imperial Salem; rise〃

it is worth while to realize that the voice that first sung it was that of the irritable little poet who found some of his scant comfort in the grand words and phrases and ideas of our English Bible。

With these sixShakespeare; Milton; Bunyan; Dryden; Addison; and Popethe course of the Jacobean literature is sufficiently measured。 There are many lesser names; but these are the ones which made it an epoch in literature; and these are at their best under the power of the Bible。

In the Georgian group we need to call only five great names which have had creative influence in literature。 Ordinary culture in literature will include some acquaintance with each of them。 In the order of their death they are Shelley (1829。); Byron (1824); Coleridge (1831); Walter Scott (1832); and Wordsworth (1850)。 The last long outlived the others; but he belongs with them; because he was born earlier than any other in the group and did his chief work in their time and before the later group appeared。 Except Wordsworth; all these were gone before Queen Victoria came to the throne in 1837。 Three other names could be called: Keats; Robert Burns; and Charles Lamb。 All would illustrate what we are studying。 Keats least of all and Burns most。 They are omitted here not because they did not feel the influence of the English Bible; not because they do not constantly show its influence; but because they are not so creative as the others; they have not so influenced the current of literature。 At any rate; the five named will represent worthily and with sufficient completeness the Georgian period of English literature。

Nothing could reveal more clearly than this list how we are distinguishing the Bible as literature from the Bible as an authoritative book in morals。 One would much dislike to credit the Bible with any part of the personal life of Shelley or Byron。 They were friends; they; were geniuses; but they were both badly afflicted with common moral leprosy。 It is playing with morals to excuse either of them because he was a genius。 Nothing in the genius of either demanded or was served by the course of cheap immorality which both practised。 It was not because Shelley was a genius that he married Harriet Westbrook; then ran away with Mary Godwin; then tried to get the two to become friends and neighbors until his own wife committed suicide; it was not his genius that made him yield to the influence of Emilia Viviani and write her the poem 〃Epipsychidion;〃 telling her and the world that he 〃was never attached to that great sect who believed that each one should select out of the crowd a mistress or a friend〃 and let the rest go。 That was not genius; that was just common passion; and our divorce courts are full of Shelleys of that type。 So Byron's personal immorality is not to be explained nor excused on the ground of his genius。 It was not genius that led him so astray in England that his wife had to divorce him; and that public opinion drove him out of the land。 It was not his genius that sent him to visit Shelley and his mistress at Lake Geneva and seduce their guest; so that she bore him a daughter; though she was never his wife。 It was not genius that made him pick up still another companion out of several in Italy and live with her in immoral relation。 In the name of common decency let no one stand up for Shelley and Byron in their personal characters! There are not two moral laws; one for geniuses and one for common people。 Byron; at any rate; was never deceived about himself; never blamed his genius nor his conscience for his wrong。 These are striking lines in 〃Childe Harold;〃 in which he disclaims all right to sympathy; because;

 〃The thorns which I have reaped are of the tree  I planted;they have torn me and I bleed。  I should have known what fruit would spring from      such a tree。〃


Shelley's wife would not say that for him。 〃In all Shelley did;〃 she says; 〃he at the time of doing it believed himself justified to his own conscience。〃 Well; so much the worse for Shelley! Geniuses are not the only men who can find good reason for doing what they want to do。 One of Shelley's critics suggests that the trouble was his introduction into personal conduct of the imagination which he ought to have saved for his writing。 Perhaps we might explain Byron's misconduct by reminding ourselves of his club…foot; and applying one code of morals to men with club…feet and another to men with normal feet。

If we speak of the influence of the Bible on these men; it must be on their literary work; and when we find it there; it becomes peculiar mark of its power。 They had little sense of it as moral law。 Their consciences approved it and condemned themselves; or else their delicate literary taste sensed it as a book of power。

This is notably true of Shelley。 When he was still a student in Oxford he committed himself to the opinion of another writer; that 〃the mind cannot believe in the existence of God。〃 He tries to work that out fully in his notes on 〃Queen Mab。〃 When he was hardly yet of age he himself wrote that 〃The genius of human happiness must tear every leaf from the accursed Book of God; ere man can read the inscription on its heart。〃 He once said that his highest desire was that there should be a monument to himself somewhere in the Alps which should be only a great stone with its face smoothed and this short inscription cut in it; 〃Percy Bysshe Shelley; Atheist。〃

It would seem that whatever Shelley drew of strength or inspiration from the Bible would be by way of reaction; but it is not so。 However he may have hated the 〃accursed Book of God;〃 his wife tells in her note on 〃The Revolt of Islam〃 that Shelley 〃debated whether he should devote himself to poetry or metaphysics;〃 and; resolving on the former; he 〃educated himself for it; engaging himself in the study of the poets of Greece; England; and Italy。 To these; may be added;〃 she goes on; 〃a constant perusal of portions of the Old Testament; the Book of Psalms; Job; Isaiah; and others; the sublime poetry of which filled him with delight。〃 Not only did he catch the spirit of that poetry; but its phrases haunted his memory。 In his best prose work; which he called A Defense of Poetry; there is an interesting revelation of the influence of his Bible reading upon him。 Toward the end of the essay these two sentences occur: 〃It is inconsistent with this division of our subject to cite living poets; but posterity has done ample justice to the great names now referred to。 Their errors have been weighed and found to have been dust in the balance; if their sins are as scarlet; they are now white as snow; they have been washed in the blood of the mediator and redeemer; Time。〃 There is no more eloquent passage in the essay than the one of which this is part; and yet it is full of allusion to this Book from which all pages must be torn! Even in 〃Queen Mab〃 he makes Ahasuerus; the wandering Jew; recount the Bible story in such broad outlines as could be given only by a man who was familiar with it。 When Shelley was in Italy and the word came to him of the massacre at Manchester; he wrote his 〃Masque of Anarchy。〃 There are few more melodious lines of his writing than those which occur in this long poem in the section regarding freedom。 Four of those lines are often quoted。 They are at the very heart of Shelley's best work。 Addressing freedom; he says:

 〃Thou art love: the rich have kissed  Thy feet; and; like him following Christ;  Gave their substance to the free;  And through the rough world follow thee。〃

Page after page of Shelley reveals these half… conscious refere

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的