±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > shorter logic >

µÚ35ÕÂ

shorter logic-µÚ35ÕÂ

С˵£º shorter logic ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



Without¡¡this¡¡unification¡¡of¡¡elements¡¡he¡¡is¡¡neither¡¡concrete£»¡¡nor¡¡living£»¡¡nor¡¡a¡¡spirit¡£
Thus¡¡the¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡God¡¡as¡¡a¡¡spirit¡¡necessarily¡¡implies¡¡mediation¡£¡¡The¡¡form¡¡of
immediacy£»¡¡secondly£»¡¡invests¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡with¡¡the¡¡character¡¡of¡¡independent¡¡or
self¡­centred¡¡being¡£¡¡But¡¡such¡¡predicates¡¡contradict¡¡the¡¡very¡¡essence¡¡of¡¡the
particular¡­which¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡something¡¡else¡¡outside¡£¡¡They¡¡thus¡¡invest¡¡the
finite¡¡with¡¡the¡¡character¡¡of¡¡an¡¡absolute¡£¡¡But£»¡¡besides£»¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡immediacy¡¡is
altogether¡¡abstract£º¡¡it¡¡has¡¡no¡¡preference¡¡for¡¡one¡¡set¡¡of¡¡contents¡¡more¡¡than
another£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡equally¡¡susceptible¡¡of¡¡all£º¡¡it¡¡may¡¡as¡¡well¡¡sanction¡¡what¡¡is¡¡idolatrous
and¡¡immoral¡¡as¡¡the¡¡reverse¡£¡¡Only¡¡when¡¡we¡¡discern¡¡that¡¡the¡¡content¡­the¡¡particular
¡­¡¡is¡¡not¡¡self¡­subsistent£»¡¡but¡¡derivative¡¡from¡¡something¡¡else£»¡¡are¡¡its¡¡finitude¡¡and
untruth¡¡shown¡¡in¡¡their¡¡proper¡¡light¡£¡¡Such¡¡discernment£»¡¡where¡¡the¡¡content¡¡we
discern¡¡carries¡¡with¡¡it¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡its¡¡dependent¡¡nature£»¡¡is¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡which
involves¡¡mediation¡£¡¡The¡¡only¡¡content¡¡which¡¡can¡¡be¡¡held¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡truth¡¡is¡¡one¡¡not
mediated¡¡with¡¡something¡¡else£»¡¡not¡¡limited¡¡by¡¡other¡¡things£º¡¡or£»¡¡otherwise
expressed£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡one¡¡mediated¡¡by¡¡itself£»¡¡where¡¡mediation¡¡and¡¡immediate
reference¡­to¡­self¡¡coincide¡£¡¡The¡¡understanding¡¡that¡¡fancies¡¡it¡¡has¡¡got¡¡clear¡¡of¡¡finite
knowledge£»¡¡the¡¡identity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡analytical¡¡metaphysicians¡¡and¡¡the¡¡old¡¡'rationalists'£»
abruptly¡¡takes¡¡again¡¡as¡¡principle¡¡and¡¡criterion¡¡of¡¡truth¡¡that¡¡immediacy¡¡which£»¡¡as
an¡¡abstract¡¡reference¡­to¡­self£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡same¡¡as¡¡abstract¡¡identity¡£¡¡Abstract¡¡thought
£¨the¡¡scientific¡¡form¡¡used¡¡by¡¡'reflective'¡¡metaphysic£©¡¡and¡¡abstract¡¡intuition¡¡£¨the
form¡¡used¡¡by¡¡immediate¡¡knowledge£©¡¡are¡¡one¡¡and¡¡the¡¡same¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì74n

The¡¡stereotyped¡¡opposition¡¡between¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡immediacy¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡mediation¡¡gives¡¡to¡¡the
former¡¡a¡¡half¡­ness¡¡and¡¡inadequacy¡¡that¡¡affects¡¡every¡¡content¡¡which¡¡is¡¡brought¡¡under¡¡it¡£¡¡Immediacy
means£»¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡an¡¡abstract¡¡reference¡­to¡­self£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡an¡¡abstract¡¡identity¡¡or¡¡abstract
universality¡£¡¡Accordingly¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡and¡¡real¡¡universal£»¡¡when¡¡taken¡¡merely¡¡in¡¡its¡¡immediacy£»¡¡is¡¡a
mere¡¡abstract¡¡universal£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡this¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡God¡¡is¡¡conceived¡¡as¡¡a¡¡being¡¡altogether¡¡without
determinate¡¡quality¡£¡¡To¡¡call¡¡God¡¡spirit¡¡is¡¡in¡¡that¡¡case¡¡only¡¡a¡¡phrase£º¡¡for¡¡the¡¡consciousness¡¡and
self¡­consciousness¡¡which¡¡spirit¡¡implies¡¡are¡¡impossible¡¡without¡¡a¡¡distinguishing¡¡of¡¡it¡¡from¡¡itself¡¡and
from¡¡something¡¡else£»¡¡i¡£e¡£¡¡without¡¡mediation¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì75

It¡¡was¡¡impossible¡¡for¡¡us¡¡to¡¡criticise¡¡this£»¡¡the¡¡third¡¡attitude¡¡which¡¡thought¡¡has¡¡been
made¡¡to¡¡take¡¡towards¡¡objective¡¡truth£»¡¡in¡¡any¡¡other¡¡mode¡¡than¡¡what¡¡is¡¡naturally
indicated¡¡and¡¡admitted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡itself¡£¡¡The¡¡theory¡¡asserts¡¡that¡¡immediate
knowledge¡¡is¡¡a¡¡fact¡£¡¡It¡¡has¡¡been¡¡shown¡¡to¡¡be¡¡untrue¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡an
immediate¡¡knowledge£»¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡without¡¡mediation¡¡either¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of
something¡¡else¡¡or¡¡in¡¡itself¡£¡¡It¡¡has¡¡also¡¡been¡¡explained¡¡to¡¡be¡¡false¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that
thought¡¡advances¡¡through¡¡finite¡¡and¡¡conditioned¡¡categories¡¡only£»¡¡which¡¡are
always¡¡mediated¡¡by¡¡a¡¡something¡¡else£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡forget¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡very¡¡act¡¡of
mediation¡¡the¡¡mediation¡¡itself¡¡vanishes¡£¡¡And¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that£»¡¡in¡¡point¡¡of¡¡fact£»¡¡there¡¡is
a¡¡knowledge¡¡which¡¡advances¡¡neither¡¡by¡¡unmixed¡¡immediacy¡¡nor¡¡by¡¡unmixed
mediation£»¡¡we¡¡can¡¡point¡¡to¡¡the¡¡example¡¡of¡¡Logic¡¡and¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡philosophy¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì76

If¡¡we¡¡view¡¡the¡¡maxims¡¡of¡¡immediate¡¡knowledge¡¡in¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡the¡¡uncritical
metaphysic¡¡of¡¡the¡¡past¡¡from¡¡which¡¡we¡¡started£»¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡learn¡¡from¡¡the
comparison¡¡the¡¡reactionary¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡school¡¡of¡¡Jacobi¡£¡¡His¡¡doctrine¡¡is¡¡a¡¡return
to¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡starting¡­point¡¡of¡¡this¡¡metaphysic¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Cartesian¡¡philosophy¡£¡¡Both
Jacobi¡¡and¡¡Descartes¡¡maintain¡¡the¡¡following¡¡three¡¡points£º¡¡

£¨1£©¡¡The¡¡simple¡¡inseparability¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thought¡¡and¡¡being¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thinker¡£¡¡Cogito£»¡¡ergo
sum¡¡is¡¡the¡¡same¡¡doctrine¡¡as¡¡that¡¡the¡¡being£»¡¡reality£»¡¡and¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡'Ego'¡¡is
immediately¡¡revealed¡¡to¡¡me¡¡in¡¡consciousness¡£¡¡£¨Descartes£»¡¡in¡¡fact£»¡¡is¡¡careful¡¡to
state¡¡that¡¡by¡¡thought¡¡he¡¡means¡¡consciousness¡¡in¡¡general¡£¡¡Princip¡£¡¡Phil¡£¡¡i¡£¡¡9¡££©¡¡This
inseparability¡¡is¡¡the¡¡absolutely¡¡first¡¡and¡¡most¡¡certain¡¡knowledge£»¡¡not¡¡mediated¡¡or
demonstrated¡£¡¡

£¨2£©¡¡The¡¡inseparability¡¡of¡¡existence¡¡from¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡God£º¡¡the¡¡former¡¡is
necessarily¡¡implied¡¡in¡¡the¡¡latter£»¡¡or¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡never¡¡can¡¡be¡¡without¡¡the
attribute¡¡of¡¡existence£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡necessary¡¡and¡¡eternal¡£¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Descartes£»¡¡Princip¡£¡¡Phil¡£¡¡i¡£¡¡15£º¡¡'The¡¡reader¡¡will¡¡be¡¡more¡¡disposed¡¡to¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡there¡¡exists¡¡a
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡being¡¡supremely¡¡perfect£»¡¡if¡¡he¡¡notes¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡nothing¡¡else¡¡is¡¡there¡¡found¡¡in¡¡him¡¡an
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡idea£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡he¡¡notices¡¡necessary¡¡existence¡¡to¡¡be¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡way¡£¡¡He¡¡will¡¡see¡¡that
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡idea¡¡exhibits¡¡a¡¡true¡¡and¡¡unchangeable¡¡nature¡¡¡­a¡¡nature¡¡which¡¡cannot¡¡but¡¡exist£»¡¡since
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡necessary¡¡existence¡¡is¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡it¡£'¡¡A¡¡remark¡¡which¡¡immediately¡¡follows£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡sounds
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡like¡¡mediation¡¡or¡¡demonstration£»¡¡does¡¡not¡¡really¡¡prejudice¡¡the¡¡original¡¡principle¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡In¡¡Spinoza¡¡we¡¡come¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡same¡¡statement¡¡that¡¡the¡¡essence¡¡or¡¡abstract¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡God
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡implies¡¡existence¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡of¡¡Spinoza's¡¡definitions£»¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Causa¡¡Sui¡¡£¨or¡¡Self¡­Cause£©£»
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡explains¡¡it¡¡to¡¡be¡¡'that¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡essence¡¡involves¡¡existence£»¡¡or¡¡that¡¡whose¡¡nature¡¡cannot¡¡be
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡conceived¡¡except¡¡as¡¡existing'¡£¡¡The¡¡inseparability¡¡of¡¡the¡¡notion¡¡from¡¡being¡¡is¡¡the¡¡main¡¡point¡¡and
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡fundamental¡¡hypothesis¡¡in¡¡his¡¡system¡£¡¡But¡¡what¡¡notion¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡inseparable¡¡from¡¡being£¿¡¡Not¡¡the
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡notion¡¡of¡¡finite¡¡things£»¡¡for¡¡they¡¡are¡¡so¡¡constituted¡¡as¡¡to¡¡have¡¡a¡¡contingent¡¡and¡¡a¡¡created
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡existence¡£¡¡Spinoza's¡¡eleventh¡¡proposition£»¡¡which¡¡follows¡¡with¡¡a¡¡proof¡¡that¡¡God¡¡exists
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡necessarily£»¡¡and¡¡his¡¡twentieth£»¡¡showing¡¡that¡¡God's¡¡existence¡¡and¡¡his¡¡essence¡¡are¡¡one¡¡and¡¡the
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡same£»¡¡are¡¡really¡¡superfluous£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡proof¡¡is¡¡more¡¡in¡¡form¡¡than¡¡in¡¡reality¡£¡¡To¡¡say¡¡that¡¡God¡¡is
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Substance£»¡¡the¡¡only¡¡Substance£»¡¡and¡¡that£»¡¡as¡¡Substance¡¡is¡¡Causa¡¡Sui£»¡¡God¡¡therefore¡¡exists
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡necessarily£»¡¡is¡¡merely¡¡stating¡¡that¡¡God¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡notion¡¡and¡¡the¡¡being¡¡are¡¡inseparable¡£¡¡

£¨3£©¡¡The¡¡immediate¡¡consciousness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡external¡¡things¡£¡¡By¡¡this
nothing¡¡more¡¡is¡¡meant¡¡than¡¡sense¡­consciousness¡£¡¡To¡¡have¡¡such¡¡a¡¡thing¡¡is¡¡the
slightest¡¡of¡¡all¡¡cognitions£º¡¡and¡¡the¡¡only¡¡thing¡¡worth¡¡knowing¡¡about¡¡it¡¡is¡¡that¡¡such
immediate¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡being¡¡of¡¡things¡¡external¡¡is¡¡error¡¡and¡¡delusion£»¡¡that¡¡the
sensible¡¡world¡¡as¡¡such¡¡is¡¡altogether¡¡void¡¡of¡¡truth£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡being¡¡of¡¡these¡¡external
things¡¡is¡¡accidental¡¡and¡¡passes¡¡away¡¡as¡¡a¡¡show£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡their¡¡very¡¡nature¡¡is¡¡to
have¡¡only¡¡an¡¡existence¡¡which¡¡is¡¡separable¡¡from¡¡their¡¡essence¡¡and¡¡notion¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì77

There¡¡is¡¡however¡¡a¡¡distinction¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡points¡¡of¡¡view£º¡¡

£¨1£©¡¡The¡¡Cartesian¡¡philosophy£»¡¡from¡¡these¡¡unproved¡¡postulates£»¡¡which¡¡it¡¡assumes
to¡¡be¡¡unprovable£»¡¡proceeds¡¡to¡¡wider¡¡and¡¡wider¡¡details¡¡of¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡thus
gave¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡times¡£¡¡The¡¡modern¡¡theory¡¡£¨of¡¡Jacobi£©£»¡¡on¡¡the
contrary£»¡¡£¨¡ì¡¡62£©¡¡has¡¡come¡¡to¡¡what¡¡is¡¡intrinsically¡¡a¡¡most¡¡important¡¡conclusion
that¡¡cognition£»¡¡proceeding¡¡as¡¡it¡¡must¡¡by¡¡finite¡¡mediations£»¡¡can¡¡know¡¡only¡¡the
finite£»¡¡and¡¡never¡¡embody¡¡the¡¡truth£»¡¡and¡¡would¡¡fain¡¡have¡¡the¡¡consciousness¡¡of
God¡¡go¡¡no¡¡further¡¡than¡¡the¡¡aforesaid¡¡very¡¡abstract¡¡belief¡¡that¡¡God¡¡is¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Anselm¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary¡¡says£º¡¡'Methinks¡¡it¡¡is¡¡carelessness£»¡¡if£»¡¡after¡¡we¡¡have¡¡been¡¡confirmed¡¡in
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡faith£»¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡exert¡¡ourselves¡¡to¡¡see¡¡the¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡what¡¡we¡¡believe¡£'¡¡£§Tractat¡£¡¡Cur¡¡Deus
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Homo£¿£§¡¡These¡¡words¡¡of¡¡Anselm£»¡¡in¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡the¡¡concrete¡¡truths¡¡of¡¡Christian¡¡doctrine£»
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡offer¡¡a¡¡far¡¡harder¡¡problem¡¡for¡¡investigation£»¡¡than¡¡is¡¡contemplated¡¡by¡¡this¡¡modern¡¡faith¡£¡¡

£¨2£©¡¡The¡¡modern¡¡doctrine¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡hand¡¡makes¡¡no¡¡change¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Cartesian
method¡¡of¡¡the¡¡usual¡¡scientific¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡conducts¡¡on¡¡the¡¡same¡¡plan¡¡the
experimental¡¡and¡¡finite¡¡sciences¡¡that¡¡have¡¡sprung¡¡from¡¡it¡£¡¡But£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»
when¡¡it¡¡comes¡¡to¡¡the¡¡science¡¡which¡¡has¡¡infinity¡¡for¡¡its¡¡scope£»¡¡it¡¡throws¡¡aside¡¡that
method¡¡and¡¡thus£»¡¡as¡¡it¡¡knows¡¡no¡¡other£»¡¡it¡¡rejects¡¡all¡¡methods¡£¡¡It¡¡abandons¡¡itself¡¡to
wild¡¡vagaries¡¡of¡¡imagination¡¡and¡¡assertion£»¡¡to¡¡a¡¡moral¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ