±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > shorter logic >

µÚ18ÕÂ

shorter logic-µÚ18ÕÂ

С˵£º shorter logic ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



thinks£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡an¡¡object¡¡which¡¡is¡¡itself¡£¡¡Generally¡¡speaking£»¡¡an¡¡object¡¡means¡¡a¡¡something
else£»¡¡a¡¡negative¡¡confronting¡¡me¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡where¡¡thought¡¡thinks¡¡itself£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡an¡¡object¡¡which¡¡is
at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡no¡¡object£º¡¡in¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡its¡¡objectivity¡¡is¡¡suppressed¡¡and¡¡transformed¡¡into¡¡an
idea¡£¡¡Thought£»¡¡as¡¡thought£»¡¡therefore¡¡in¡¡its¡¡unmixed¡¡nature¡¡involves¡¡no¡¡limits£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡finite¡¡only¡¡when¡¡it
keeps¡¡to¡¡limited¡¡categories£»¡¡which¡¡it¡¡believes¡¡to¡¡be¡¡ultimate¡£¡¡Infinite¡¡or¡¡speculative¡¡thought£»¡¡on¡¡the
contrary£»¡¡while¡¡it¡¡no¡¡less¡¡defines£»¡¡does¡¡in¡¡the¡¡very¡¡act¡¡of¡¡limiting¡¡and¡¡defining¡¡make¡¡that¡¡defect
vanish¡£¡¡And¡¡so¡¡infinity¡¡is¡¡not£»¡¡as¡¡most¡¡frequently¡¡happens£»¡¡to¡¡be¡¡conceived¡¡as¡¡an¡¡abstract¡¡away
and¡¡away¡¡for¡¡ever¡¡and¡¡ever£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡manner¡¡previously¡¡indicated¡£¡¡

The¡¡thinking¡¡of¡¡the¡¡old¡¡metaphysical¡¡system¡¡was¡¡finite¡£¡¡Its¡¡whole¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡action¡¡was¡¡regulated¡¡by
categories£»¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of¡¡which¡¡it¡¡believed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡permanently¡¡fixed¡¡and¡¡not¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡any¡¡further
negation¡£¡¡Thus£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡its¡¡questions¡¡was£º¡¡Has¡¡God¡¡existence£¿¡¡The¡¡question¡¡supposes¡¡that
existence¡¡is¡¡an¡¡altogether¡¡positive¡¡term£»¡¡a¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡ne¡¡plus¡¡ultra¡£¡¡We¡¡shall¡¡see¡¡however¡¡at¡¡a¡¡later
point¡¡that¡¡existence¡¡is¡¡by¡¡no¡¡means¡¡a¡¡merely¡¡positive¡¡term£»¡¡but¡¡one¡¡which¡¡is¡¡too¡¡low¡¡for¡¡the
Absolute¡¡Idea£»¡¡and¡¡unworthy¡¡of¡¡God¡£¡¡A¡¡second¡¡question¡¡in¡¡these¡¡metaphysical¡¡systems¡¡was£º¡¡Is
the¡¡world¡¡finite¡¡or¡¡infinite¡¡£¿¡¡The¡¡very¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡question¡¡assume¡¡that¡¡the¡¡finite¡¡is¡¡a¡¡permanent
contradictory¡¡to¡¡the¡¡infinite£º¡¡and¡¡one¡¡can¡¡easily¡¡see¡¡that£»¡¡when¡¡they¡¡are¡¡so¡¡opposed£»¡¡the¡¡infinite£»
which¡¡of¡¡course¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡only¡¡appears¡¡as¡¡a¡¡single¡¡aspect¡¡and¡¡suffers¡¡restriction¡¡from
the¡¡finite¡£¡¡But¡¡a¡¡restricted¡¡infinity¡¡is¡¡itself¡¡only¡¡a¡¡finite¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡same¡¡way¡¡it¡¡was¡¡asked¡¡whether¡¡the
soul¡¡was¡¡simple¡¡or¡¡composite¡£¡¡Simpleness¡¡was£»¡¡in¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡be¡¡an¡¡ultimate
characteristic£»¡¡giving¡¡expression¡¡to¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡truth¡£¡¡Far¡¡from¡¡being¡¡so£»¡¡simpleness¡¡is¡¡the¡¡expression
of¡¡a¡¡half¡­truth£»¡¡as¡¡one¡­sided¡¡and¡¡abstract¡¡as¡¡existence¡¡¡­¡¡a¡¡term¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡which£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡shall
hereafter¡¡see£»¡¡is¡¡itself¡¡untrue¡¡and¡¡hence¡¡unable¡¡to¡¡hold¡¡truth¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡soul¡¡be¡¡viewed¡¡as¡¡merely¡¡and
abstractly¡¡simple£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡characterised¡¡in¡¡an¡¡inadequate¡¡and¡¡finite¡¡way¡£¡¡

It¡¡was¡¡therefore¡¡the¡¡main¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pre¡­Kantian¡¡metaphysic¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡whether¡¡predicates
of¡¡the¡¡kind¡¡mentioned¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡ascribed¡¡to¡¡its¡¡objects¡£¡¡Now¡¡these¡¡predicates¡¡are¡¡after¡¡all¡¡only
limited¡¡formulae¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡which£»¡¡instead¡¡of¡¡expressing¡¡the¡¡truth£»¡¡merely¡¡impose¡¡a¡¡limit¡£
More¡¡than¡¡this£»¡¡it¡¡should¡¡be¡¡noted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡feature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡method¡¡lay¡¡in¡¡'assigning'¡¡or
'attributing'¡¡predicates¡¡to¡¡the¡¡object¡¡that¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡cognised£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡to¡¡God¡£¡¡But¡¡attribution
is¡¡no¡¡more¡¡than¡¡an¡¡external¡¡reflection¡¡about¡¡the¡¡object£º¡¡the¡¡predicates¡¡by¡¡which¡¡the¡¡object¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be
determined¡¡are¡¡supplied¡¡from¡¡the¡¡resources¡¡of¡¡picture¡­thought£»¡¡and¡¡are¡¡applied¡¡in¡¡a¡¡mechanical
way¡£¡¡Whereas£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡are¡¡to¡¡have¡¡genuine¡¡cognition£»¡¡the¡¡object¡¡must¡¡characterise¡¡its¡¡own¡¡self¡¡and
not¡¡derive¡¡its¡¡predicates¡¡from¡¡without¡£¡¡Even¡¡supposing¡¡we¡¡follow¡¡the¡¡method¡¡of¡¡predicating£»¡¡the
mind¡¡cannot¡¡help¡¡feeling¡¡that¡¡predicates¡¡of¡¡this¡¡sort¡¡fail¡¡to¡¡exhaust¡¡the¡¡object¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡same¡¡point
of¡¡view¡¡the¡¡Orientals¡¡are¡¡quite¡¡correct¡¡in¡¡calling¡¡God¡¡the¡¡many¡­named¡¡or¡¡the¡¡myriad¡­named¡¡One¡£
One¡¡after¡¡another¡¡of¡¡these¡¡finite¡¡categories¡¡leaves¡¡the¡¡soul¡¡unsatisfied£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Oriental¡¡sage¡¡is
compelled¡¡unceasingly¡¡to¡¡seek¡¡for¡¡more¡¡and¡¡more¡¡of¡¡such¡¡predicates¡£¡¡In¡¡finite¡¡things¡¡it¡¡is¡¡no¡¡doubt
the¡¡case¡¡that¡¡they¡¡have¡¡to¡¡be¡¡characterised¡¡through¡¡finite¡¡predicates£º¡¡and¡¡with¡¡these¡¡things¡¡the
understanding¡¡finds¡¡proper¡¡scope¡¡for¡¡its¡¡special¡¡action¡£¡¡Itself¡¡finite£»¡¡it¡¡knows¡¡only¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the
finite¡£¡¡Thus£»¡¡when¡¡I¡¡call¡¡some¡¡action¡¡a¡¡theft£»¡¡I¡¡have¡¡characterised¡¡the¡¡action¡¡in¡¡its¡¡essential¡¡facts£»
and¡¡such¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡is¡¡sufficient¡¡for¡¡the¡¡judge¡£¡¡Similarly£»¡¡finite¡¡things¡¡stand¡¡to¡¡each¡¡other¡¡as¡¡cause
and¡¡effect£»¡¡force¡¡and¡¡exercise£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡they¡¡are¡¡apprehended¡¡in¡¡these¡¡categories£»¡¡they¡¡are
known¡¡in¡¡their¡¡finitude¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡defined¡¡by¡¡these¡¡finite¡¡predicates¡£¡¡To
try¡¡to¡¡do¡¡so¡¡was¡¡the¡¡defect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡old¡¡metaphysic¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì29

Predicates¡¡of¡¡this¡¡kind£»¡¡taken¡¡individually£»¡¡have¡¡but¡¡a¡¡limited¡¡range¡¡of¡¡meaning£»
and¡¡no¡¡one¡¡can¡¡fail¡¡to¡¡perceive¡¡how¡¡inadequate¡¡they¡¡are£»¡¡and¡¡how¡¡far¡¡they¡¡fall
below¡¡the¡¡fullness¡¡of¡¡detail¡¡which¡¡our¡¡imaginative¡¡thought¡¡gives£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case£»¡¡for
example£»¡¡of¡¡God£»¡¡Mind£»¡¡or¡¡Nature¡£¡¡Besides£»¡¡though¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡of¡¡their¡¡being¡¡all
predicates¡¡of¡¡one¡¡subject¡¡supplies¡¡them¡¡with¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡connection£»¡¡their¡¡several
meanings¡¡keep¡¡them¡¡apart£º¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡each¡¡is¡¡brought¡¡in¡¡as¡¡a¡¡stranger¡¡in
relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡others¡£¡¡

£¨1£©¡¡The¡¡first¡¡of¡¡these¡¡defects¡¡the¡¡Orientals¡¡sought¡¡to¡¡remedy£»¡¡when£»¡¡for¡¡example£»
they¡¡defined¡¡God¡¡by¡¡attributing¡¡to¡¡Him¡¡many¡¡names£»¡¡but¡¡still¡¡they¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡the
number¡¡of¡¡names¡¡would¡¡have¡¡had¡¡to¡¡be¡¡infinite¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì30

£¨2£©¡¡In¡¡the¡¡second¡¡place£»¡¡the¡¡metaphysical¡¡systems¡¡adopted¡¡a¡¡wrong¡¡criterion¡£
Their¡¡objects¡¡were¡¡no¡¡doubt¡¡totalities¡¡which¡¡in¡¡their¡¡own¡¡proper¡¡selves¡¡belong¡¡to
reason¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡organised¡¡and¡¡systematically¡¡developed¡¡universe¡¡of¡¡thought¡£
But¡¡these¡¡totalities¡¡¡­God£»¡¡the¡¡Soul£»¡¡the¡¡World¡­were¡¡taken¡¡by¡¡the¡¡metaphysician¡¡as
subjects¡¡made¡¡and¡¡ready£»¡¡to¡¡form¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡for¡¡an¡¡application¡¡of¡¡the¡¡categories¡¡of
the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡They¡¡were¡¡assumed¡¡from¡¡popular¡¡conception¡£¡¡Accordingly
popular¡¡conception¡¡was¡¡the¡¡only¡¡canon¡¡for¡¡settling¡¡whether¡¡or¡¡not¡¡the¡¡predicates
were¡¡suitable¡¡and¡¡sufficient¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì31

The¡¡common¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡God£»¡¡the¡¡Soul£»¡¡the¡¡World£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡supposed¡¡to
afford¡¡thought¡¡a¡¡firm¡¡and¡¡fast¡¡footing¡£¡¡They¡¡do¡¡not¡¡really¡¡do¡¡so¡£¡¡Besides¡¡having¡¡a
particular¡¡and¡¡subjective¡¡character¡¡clinging¡¡to¡¡them£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡leaving¡¡room¡¡for
great¡¡variety¡¡of¡¡interpretation£»¡¡they¡¡themselves¡¡first¡¡of¡¡all¡¡require¡¡a¡¡firm¡¡and¡¡fast
definition¡¡by¡¡thought¡£¡¡This¡¡may¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡any¡¡of¡¡these¡¡propositions¡¡where¡¡the
predicate£»¡¡or¡¡in¡¡philosophy¡¡the¡¡category£»¡¡is¡¡needed¡¡to¡¡indicate¡¡what¡¡the¡¡subject£»¡¡or
the¡¡conception¡¡we¡¡start¡¡with£»¡¡is¡£¡¡

In¡¡such¡¡a¡¡sentence¡¡as¡¡'God¡¡is¡¡eternal'£»¡¡we¡¡begin¡¡with¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡God£»¡¡not
knowing¡¡as¡¡yet¡¡what¡¡he¡¡is£º¡¡to¡¡tell¡¡us¡¡that£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡business¡¡of¡¡the¡¡predicate¡£¡¡In¡¡the
principles¡¡of¡¡logic£»¡¡accordingly£»¡¡where¡¡the¡¡terms¡¡formulating¡¡the¡¡subject¡­matter
are¡¡those¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡only£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡merely¡¡superfluous¡¡to¡¡make¡¡these¡¡categories
predicates¡¡to¡¡propositions¡¡in¡¡which¡¡God£»¡¡or£»¡¡still¡¡vaguer£»¡¡the¡¡Absolute£»¡¡is¡¡the
subject£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡would¡¡also¡¡have¡¡the¡¡disadvantage¡¡of¡¡suggesting¡¡another¡¡canon¡¡than
the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡thought¡£¡¡Besides£»¡¡the¡¡propositional¡¡form¡¡£¨and¡¡for¡¡proposition£»¡¡it
would¡¡be¡¡more¡¡correct¡¡to¡¡substitute¡¡judgement£©¡¡is¡¡not¡¡suited¡¡to¡¡express¡¡the
concrete¡¡¡­¡¡and¡¡the¡¡true¡¡is¡¡always¡¡concrete¡¡¡­¡¡or¡¡the¡¡speculative¡£¡¡Every¡¡judgement¡¡is
by¡¡its¡¡form¡¡one¡­sided¡¡and£»¡¡to¡¡that¡¡extent£»¡¡false¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì31n

This¡¡metaphysic¡¡was¡¡not¡¡free¡¡or¡¡objective¡¡thinking¡£¡¡Instead¡¡of¡¡letting¡¡the¡¡object¡¡freely¡¡and
spontaneously¡¡expound¡¡its¡¡own¡¡characteristics£»¡¡metaphysic¡¡presupposed¡¡it¡¡ready¡­made¡£¡¡If¡¡anyone
wishes¡¡to¡¡know¡¡what¡¡free¡¡thought¡¡means£»¡¡he¡¡must¡¡go¡¡to¡¡Greek¡¡philosophy£º¡¡for¡¡Scholasticism£»¡¡like
these¡¡metaphysical¡¡systems£»¡¡accepted¡¡its¡¡facts£»¡¡and¡¡accepted¡¡them¡¡as¡¡a¡¡dogma¡¡from¡¡the¡¡authority
of¡¡the¡¡Church¡£¡¡We¡¡moderns£»¡¡too£»¡¡by¡¡our¡¡whole¡¡upbringing£»¡¡have¡¡been¡¡initiated¡¡into¡¡ideas¡¡which¡¡it
is¡¡extremely¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡overstep£»¡¡on¡¡account¡¡of¡¡their¡¡far¡­reaching¡¡significance¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡ancient
philosophers¡¡were¡¡in¡¡a¡¡different¡¡position¡£¡¡They¡¡were¡¡men¡¡who¡¡lived¡¡wholly¡¡in¡¡the¡¡perceptions¡¡of
the¡¡senses£»¡¡and¡¡who£»¡¡after¡¡their¡¡rejection¡¡of¡¡mythology¡¡and¡¡its¡¡fancies£»¡¡presupposed¡¡nothing¡¡but¡¡the
heaven¡¡above¡¡and¡¡the¡¡earth¡¡around¡£¡¡In¡¡these¡¡material£»¡¡non¡­metaphysical¡¡surroundings£»¡¡thought¡¡is
free¡¡and¡¡enjoys¡¡its¡¡own¡¡privacy¡¡¡­¡¡cleared¡¡of¡¡everything¡¡material¡¡and¡¡thoroughly¡¡at¡¡home¡£¡¡This
feeling¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡all¡¡our¡¡own¡¡is¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡free¡¡thought¡¡¡­¡¡of¡¡that¡¡voyage¡¡into¡¡the¡¡open£»
where¡¡nothing¡¡is¡¡below¡¡us¡¡or¡¡above¡¡us£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡stand¡¡in¡¡solitude¡¡with¡¡ourselves¡¡alone¡£¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì32

£¨3£©¡¡In¡¡the¡¡third¡¡place£»¡¡this¡¡system¡¡of¡¡metaphysic¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ