seven discourses on art-第12章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
one。 The sublime impresses the mind at once with one great idea； it is a single blow： the elegant indeed may be produced by a repetition； by an accumulation of many minute circumstances。
However great the difference is between the composition of the Venetian and the rest of the Italian schools； there is full as great a disparity in the effect of their pictures as produced by colours。 And though in this respect the Venetians must be allowed extraordinary skill； yet even that skill； as they have employed it； will but ill correspond with the great style。 Their colouring is not only too brilliant； but； I will venture to say； too harmonious to produce that solidity； steadiness； and simplicity of effect which heroic subjects require； and which simple or grave colours only can give to a work。 That they are to be cautiously studied by those who are ambitious of treading the great walk of history is confirmed； if it wants confirmation； by the greatest of all authorities； Michael Angelo。 This wonderful man； after having seen a picture by Titian； told Vasari； who accompanied him； 〃that he liked much his colouring and manner； but then he added； that it was a pity the Venetian painters did not learn to draw correctly in their early youth； and adopt a better manner of study。〃
By this it appears that the principal attention of the Venetian painters； in the opinion of Michael Angelo； seemed to be engrossed by the study of colours； to the neglect of the ideal beauty of form； or propriety of expression。 But if general censure was given to that school from the sight of a picture of Titian； how much more heavily； and more justly； would the censure fall on Paulo Veronese； or more especially on Tintoret？ And here I cannot avoid citing Vasari's opinion of the style and manner of Tintoret。 〃Of all the extraordinary geniuses；〃 says he； 〃that have ever practised the art of painting； for wild； capricious； extravagant； and fantastical inventions； for furious impetuosity and boldness in the execution of his work； there is none like Tintoret； his strange whims are even beyond extravagance； and his works seem to be produced rather by chance than in consequence of any previous design； as if he wanted to convince the world that； the art was a trifle； and of the most easy attainment。〃
For my own part； when I speak of the Venetian painters； I wish to be understood to mean Paulo Veronese and Tintoret； to the exclusion of Titian； for though his style is not so pure as that of many other of the Italian schools； yet there is a sort of senatorial dignity about him； which； however awkward in his imitators； seems to become him exceedingly。 His portraits alone； from the nobleness and simplicity of character which he always gave them； will entitle him to the greatest respect； as he undoubtedly stands in the first rank in this branch of the art。
It is not with Titian； but with the seducing qualities of the two former； that I could wish to caution you； against being too much captivated。 These are the persons who may be said to have exhausted all the powers of florid eloquence； to debauch the young and unexperienced； and have； without doubt； been the cause of turning off the attention of the connoisseur and of the patron of art； as well as that of the painter； from those higher excellences of which the art is capable； and which ought to be required in every considerable production。 By them； and their imitators； a style merely ornamental has been disseminated throughout all Europe。 Rubens carried it to Flanders； Voet to France； and Luca Giordano to Spain and Naples。
The Venetian is indeed the most splendid of the schools of elegance； and it is not without reason that the best performances in this lower school are valued higher than the second…rate performances of those above them； for every picture has value when it has a decided character； and is excellent in its kind。 But the student must take care not to be so much dazzled with this splendour as to be tempted to imitate what must ultimately lead from perfection。 Poussin； whose eye was always steadily fixed on the sublime； has been often heard to say； 〃That a particular attention to colouring was an obstacle to the student in his progress to the great end and design of the art； and that he who attaches himself to this principal end will acquire by practice a reasonably good method of colouring。〃
Though it be allowed that elaborate harmony of colouring； a brilliancy of tints； a soft and gradual transition from one to another； present to the eye what an harmonious concert of music does to the ear； it must be remembered that painting is not merely a gratification of the sight。 Such excellence； though properly cultivated where nothing higher than elegance is intended； is weak and unworthy of regard； when the work aspires to grandeur and sublimity。
The same reasons that have been urged why a mixture of the Venetian style cannot improve the great style will hold good in regard to the Flemish and Dutch schools。 Indeed； the Flemish school； of which Rubens is the head； was formed upon that of the Venetian； like them； he took his figures too much from the people before him。 But it must be allowed in favour of the Venetians that he was more gross than they； and carried all their mistaken methods to a far greater excess。 In the Venetian school itself； where they all err from the same cause； there is a difference in the effect。 The difference between Paulo and Bassano seems to be only that one introduced Venetian gentlemen into his pictures； and the other the boors of the district of Bassano； and called them patriarchs and prophets。
The painters of the Dutch school have still more locality。 With them； a history piece is properly a portrait of themselves； whether they describe the inside or outside of their houses； we have their own people engaged in their own peculiar occupations； working or drinking； playing or fighting。 The circumstances that enter into a picture of this kind are so far from giving a general view of human life that they exhibit all the minute particularities of a nation differing in several respects from the rest of mankind。 Yet； let them have their share of more humble praise。 The painters of this school are excellent in their own way； they are only ridiculous when they attempt general history on their own narrow principles； and debase great events by the meanness of their characters。
Some inferior dexterity； some extraordinary mechanical power； is apparently that from which they seek distinction。 Thus； we see； that school alone has the custom of representing candle…light； not as it really appears to us by night； but red； as it would illuminate objects to a spectator by day。 Such tricks； however pardonable in the little style； where petty effects are the sole end； are inexcusable in the greater； where the attention should never be drawn aside by trifles； but should be entirely occupied by the subject itself。
The same local principles which characterise the Dutch school extend even to their landscape painters； and Rubens himself； who has painted many landscapes； has sometimes transgressed in this particular。 Their pieces in this way are； I think； always a representation of an individual spot； and each in its kind a very faithful but very confined portrait。
Claude Lorraine； on the contrary； was convinced that taking nature as he found it seldom produced beauty。 His pictures are a composition of the various draughts which he has previously made from various beautiful scenes and prospects。 However； Rubens in some measure has made amends for the deficiency with which he is charged； he has contrived to raise and animate his otherwise uninteresting views； by introducing a rainbow； storm； or some particular accidental effect of light。 That the practice of Claude Lorraine； in respect to his choice； is to be adopted by landscape painters； in opposition to that of the Flemish and Dutch schools； there can be no doubt； as its truth is founded upon the same principle as that by which the historical painter acquires perfect form。 But whether landscape painting has a right to aspire so far as to reject what the painters call accidents of nature is not easy to determine。 It is
