±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > »ù´¡¿Æѧµç×ÓÊé > 30+mba >

µÚ58ÕÂ

30+mba-µÚ58ÕÂ

С˵£º 30+mba ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



death¡¡in¡¡1924£»¡¡defined¡¡economics¡¡in¡¡his¡¡influential¡¡textbook¡¡Principles¡¡
of¡¡Economics¡¡as£º¡¡¡®a¡¡study¡¡of¡¡mankind¡¡in¡¡the¡¡ordinary¡¡business¡¡of¡¡life£»¡¡it¡¡
examines¡¡that¡¡part¡¡of¡¡individual¡¡and¡¡social¡¡action¡¡which¡¡is¡¡most¡¡closely¡¡
connected¡¡with¡¡the¡¡a¡£¡£ainment¡¡and¡¡with¡¡the¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡material¡¡requisites¡¡
of¡¡well¡­being¡£¡¡Thus¡¡it¡¡is¡¡on¡¡one¡¡side¡¡a¡¡study¡¡of¡¡wealth£»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other£»¡¡
and¡¡more¡¡important¡¡side£»¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡man¡£¡¯¡¡Today¡¡that¡¡definition¡¡
has¡¡been¡¡shortened¡¡in¡¡most¡¡textbooks¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡to£º¡¡¡®Economics¡¡is¡¡the¡¡
social¡¡science¡¡which¡¡examines¡¡how¡¡people¡¡choose¡¡to¡¡use¡¡limited¡¡or¡¡scarce¡¡
resources¡¡in¡¡a¡£¡£empting¡¡to¡¡satisfy¡¡their¡¡unlimited¡¡wants¡£¡¯¡¡
The¡¡dismal¡¡science£»¡¡as¡¡economics¡¡is¡¡o¡£¡£en¡¡referred¡¡to£»¡¡reveals¡¡something¡¡
of¡¡the¡¡contradictions¡¡inherent¡¡in¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡itself¡£¡¡Science¡¡to¡¡most¡¡people¡¡
means¡¡a¡¡subject¡¡prising¡¡fundamental¡¡truths¡¡that¡¡hold¡¡good¡¡under¡¡all¡¡
conditions¡¡and¡¡forever¡£¡¡Two¡¡and¡¡two¡¡equals¡¡four£»¡¡or¡¡the¡¡area¡¡of¡¡a¡¡circle¡¡=¡¡
¦Ðr2£»¡¡work¡¡equally¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡propositions¡¡in¡¡Mongolia¡¡and¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Moon¡£¡¡
But¡¡put¡¡two¡¡economists¡¡together¡¡and¡¡you¡¡will¡¡get¡¡three¡¡economic¡¡theories¡£¡¡
Worse¡¡still£»¡¡if¡¡you¡¡put¡¡three¡¡together¡¡you¡¡could¡¡end¡¡up¡¡with¡¡six£¡¡¡
7
196¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
SCHOOLS¡¡OF¡¡ECONOMIC¡¡THOUGHT¡¡
Groups¡¡of¡¡economists¡¡who¡¡broadly¡¡share¡¡the¡¡same¡¡views¡¡are¡¡collectively¡¡
known¡¡as¡¡schools¡£¡¡Thinking¡¡of¡¡these¡¡as¡¡places¡¡where¡¡people¡¡are¡¡learning¡¡
about¡¡a¡¡constantly¡¡changing¡¡dynamic¡¡subject¡¡is¡¡a¡¡more¡¡useful¡¡concept¡¡than¡¡
considering¡¡economics¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡science¡£¡¡With¡¡Buddha¡¡seeking¡¡to¡¡eliminate¡¡
want£»¡¡Malthus¡¡who¡¡was¡¡sure¡¡that¡¡human¡¡populations¡¡grew¡¡faster¡¡than¡¡
food¡¡production¡¡and¡¡so¡¡charity¡¡was¡¡self¡­defeating£»¡¡Marx¡¡and¡¡Keynes¡¡who¡¡
for¡¡different¡¡reasons¡¡saw¡¡the¡¡state¡¯s¡¡role¡¡as¡¡central¡¡and¡¡Adam¡¡Smith¡¡whose¡¡
¡®Invisible¡¡Hand¡¯¡¡saw¡¡all¡¡economic¡¡activity¡¡as¡¡being¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡
unintended¡¡consequences£»¡¡there¡¡has¡¡been¡¡and¡¡is¡¡some¡¡scope¡¡for¡¡diversity¡£¡¡
The¡¡two¡¡economic¡¡theories¡¡that¡¡every¡¡self¡­respecting¡¡MBA¡¡must¡¡have¡¡an¡¡
appreciation¡¡of¡¡are£º¡¡
¡£¡¡Keynesian£º¡¡A¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡macroeconomics¡¡developed¡¡by¡¡British¡¡economist¡¡
John¡¡Maynard¡¡Keynes¡¡and¡¡documented¡¡in¡¡his¡¡book¡¡The¡¡General¡¡
Theory¡¡of¡¡Employment£»¡¡Interest¡¡and¡¡Money£»¡¡published¡¡in¡¡1936¡£¡¡He¡¡argued¡¡
that¡¡low¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡recessions¡¡and¡¡that¡¡government¡¡
fiscal¡¡policies¡¡£¨see¡¡below£©¡¡should¡¡be¡¡the¡¡method¡¡employed¡¡to¡¡
create¡¡employment£»¡¡control¡¡inflation¡¡and¡¡stabilize¡¡business¡¡cycles¡£¡¡
This¡¡work¡¡initiated¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡study¡¡of¡¡macroeconomics¡¡and¡¡guided¡¡
economic¡¡thinking£»¡¡only¡¡diminishing¡¡in¡¡popularity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡1970s¡¡when¡¡
violent¡¡shocks¡¡to¡¡economies£»¡¡caused¡¡particularly¡¡by¡¡escalating¡¡oil¡¡prices£»¡¡
simultaneously¡¡led¡¡to¡¡high¡¡unemployment¡¡and¡¡high¡¡inflation¡¡rates¡£¡¡
This¡¡challenged¡¡the¡¡central¡¡implications¡¡of¡¡Keynesian¡¡economics¡£¡¡
¡£¡¡Monetarist£º¡¡First¡¡put¡¡forward¡¡by¡¡the¡¡economist¡¡Milton¡¡Friedman¡¡and¡¡
the¡¡Chicago¡¡school¡¡of¡¡economists¡£¡¡Friedman¡¡and¡¡Anna¡¡Schwartz¡¡£¨an¡¡
economist¡¡at¡¡the¡¡US¡¡National¡¡Bureau¡¡of¡¡Economic¡¡Research£©¡¡in¡¡their¡¡
book¡¡Research¡¡Monetary¡¡History¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡1867¨C1960¡¡argued¡¡
that¡¡¡®inflation¡¡is¡¡always¡¡and¡¡everywhere¡¡a¡¡monetary¡¡phenomenon¡¯¡£¡¡
Friedman¡¡advocated¡¡that¡¡a¡¡country¡¯s¡¡central¡¡bank¡¡should¡¡pursue¡¡a¡¡
monetary¡¡policy¡¡£¨see¡¡below£©¡¡such¡¡as¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡the¡¡supply¡¡of¡¡and¡¡demand¡¡
for¡¡money¡¡at¡¡equilibrium¡£¡¡By¡¡1990¡¡monetarism¡¡was¡¡being¡¡challenged¡¡
as¡¡it¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡reconciled¡¡with£»¡¡among¡¡other¡¡things£»¡¡the¡¡inability¡¡of¡¡
monetary¡¡policy¡¡alone¡¡to¡¡stimulate¡¡the¡¡economy¡¡in¡¡the¡¡2001¨C03¡¡period¡£¡¡
MICRO¡¡VS¡¡MACROECONOMICS¡¡
Microeconomics¡¡is¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡economics¡¡as¡¡it¡¡affects¡¡small¡¡units¡¡such¡¡as¡¡
individuals£»¡¡families£»¡¡firms¡¡and¡¡industries¡£¡¡Macro¡¡is¡¡a¡¡study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡forces¡¡
that¡¡affect¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡economy¡£¡¡The¡¡main¡¡concept¡¡used¡¡in¡¡microeconomics£»¡¡
and¡¡one¡¡that¡¡underpins¡¡almost¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡economics£»¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
price¡¡elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡£¡¡The¡¡concept¡¡itself¡¡is¡¡simple¡¡enough¡£¡¡The¡¡higher¡¡
Economics¡¡197¡¡
the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡a¡¡good¡¡or¡¡service¡¡the¡¡less¡¡of¡¡it¡¡you¡¡are¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡sell¡£¡¡Obviously¡¡it¡¯s¡¡
not¡¡quite¡¡that¡¡simple¡¡in¡¡practice£»¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡buyers£»¡¡their¡¡expectations£»¡¡
preference¡¡and¡¡ability¡¡to¡¡pay£»¡¡the¡¡availability¡¡of¡¡substitute¡¡products¡¡also¡¡
have¡¡an¡¡effect¡£¡¡Figure¡¡7¡£1¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡a¡¡theoretical¡¡demand¡¡curve¡£¡¡
The¡¡figure¡¡shows¡¡how¡¡the¡¡volume¡¡of¡¡sales¡¡of¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡good¡¡or¡¡service¡¡
will¡¡change¡¡with¡¡changes¡¡in¡¡price¡£¡¡The¡¡elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡a¡¡measure¡¡
of¡¡the¡¡degree¡¡to¡¡which¡¡consumers¡¡are¡¡sensitive¡¡to¡¡price¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡calculated¡¡
by¡¡dividing¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡change¡¡in¡¡demand¡¡by¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡change¡¡
in¡¡price¡£¡¡If¡¡a¡¡price¡¡is¡¡reduced¡¡by¡¡50¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡£¨eg¡¡from¡¡¡ê100¡¡to¡¡¡ê50£©¡¡and¡¡the¡¡
quantity¡¡demanded¡¡increased¡¡by¡¡100¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡£¨eg¡¡from¡¡1£»000¡¡to¡¡2£»000£©£»¡¡the¡¡
elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡¡coefficient¡¡is¡¡2¡¡£¨100/50£©¡£¡¡Here¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡demanded¡¡
changes¡¡by¡¡a¡¡bigger¡¡percentage¡¡than¡¡the¡¡price¡¡change£»¡¡so¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡
considered¡¡to¡¡be¡¡elastic¡£¡¡Were¡¡the¡¡demand¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case¡¡to¡¡rise¡¡by¡¡only¡¡25¡¡
per¡¡cent£»¡¡then¡¡the¡¡elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡¡coefficient¡¡would¡¡be¡¡0¡£5¡¡£¨25/100£©¡£¡¡
Here¡¡the¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡described¡¡as¡¡being¡¡¡®inelastic¡¯¡¡as¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡demand¡¡
change¡¡is¡¡a¡¡smaller¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡price¡¡change¡£¡¡
Having¡¡a¡¡feel¡¡for¡¡elasticity¡¡is¡¡important¡¡in¡¡developing¡¡a¡¡business¡¯s¡¡
marketing¡¡strategy£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡perfect¡¡scientific¡¡way¡¡to¡¡work¡¡out¡¡what¡¡
the¡¡demand¡¡coefficient¡¡is£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡to¡¡be¡¡assessed¡¡by¡¡¡®feel¡¯¡£¡¡Unfortunately£»¡¡the¡¡
price¡¡elasticity¡¡changes¡¡at¡¡different¡¡price¡¡levels¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡reducing¡¡the¡¡
price¡¡of¡¡vodka¡¡from¡¡¡ê10¡¡to¡¡¡ê5¡¡might¡¡double¡¡sales£»¡¡but¡¡halving¡¡it¡¡again¡¡may¡¡
not¡¡have¡¡such¡¡a¡¡dramatic¡¡effect¡£¡¡In¡¡fact¡¡it¡¡could¡¡encourage¡¡one¡¡group¡¡of¡¡
buyers£»¡¡those¡¡giving¡¡it¡¡as¡¡a¡¡present£»¡¡to¡¡feel¡¡that¡¡giving¡¡something¡¡that¡¡cheap¡¡
is¡¡rather¡¡insulting¡£¡¡
MARKET¡¡STRUCTURES¡¡
The¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡economics¡¡as¡¡practised¡¡in¡¡advanced¡¡economies¡¡
is¡¡predicated¡¡on¡¡the¡¡belief¡¡that¡¡market¡¡forces¡¡are¡¡allowed¡¡a¡¡large¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡
High¡¡
High¡¡
Low¡¡
Price¡¡
Volume¡¡
Figure¡¡7¡£1¡¡The¡¡demand¡¡curve
198¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
freedom¡£¡¡New¡¡firms¡¡can¡¡set¡¡up¡¡in¡¡business£»¡¡charging¡¡the¡¡price¡¡they¡¡see¡¡fit£»¡¡
and¡¡if¡¡their¡¡strategy¡¡is¡¡flawed¡¡they¡¡will¡¡be¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡fail¡¡£¨see¡¡also¡¡Chapter¡¡
8£»¡¡Entrepreneurship£©¡£¡¡Price¡¡is¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡send¡¡important¡¡signals¡¡throughout¡¡
the¡¡economy£»¡¡apportioning¡¡demand¡¡and¡¡resources¡¡accordingly¡£¡¡But¡¡perfect¡¡
petition£»¡¡where¡¡price¡¡is¡¡allowed¡¡such¡¡freedom£»¡¡is¡¡only¡¡one¡¡of¡¡four¡¡
prevailing¡¡market¡¡structures£»¡¡although¡¡market¡¡economies¡¡are¡¡dominated¡¡
by¡¡near¡­perfect¡¡petition£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡not¡¡maintained¡¡without¡¡a¡¡struggle¡£¡¡
The¡¡following¡¡are¡¡the¡¡four¡¡market¡¡structures¡¡that¡¡are¡¡at¡¡work¡¡in¡¡
economies¡£¡¡
Monopoly¡¡
Monopolies¡¡exist¡¡where¡¡a¡¡single¡¡supplier¡¡dominates¡¡the¡¡market¡¡and¡¡so¡¡
renders¡¡normal¡¡petitive¡¡forces¡¡largely¡¡redundant¡£¡¡Price£»¡¡quality¡¡and¡¡
innovation¡¡are¡¡promised£»¡¡so¡¡deliver¡¡less¡¡value¡¡to¡¡the¡¡end¡¡consumer¡¡
than¡¡they¡¡might¡¡otherwise¡¡expect¡£¡¡Microso¡£¡£¡¡has¡¡a¡¡near¡­monopolistic¡¡grip¡¡
on¡¡the¡¡operating¡¡system¡¡market£»¡¡as¡¡has¡¡Pfizer£»¡¡the¡¡pharmaceutical¡¡giant£»¡¡
through¡¡its¡¡patent¡¡on¡¡the¡¡drug¡¡Viagra£»¡¡and¡¡British¡¡Airports¡¡Authority¡¡
£¨BAA£©£»¡¡which¡¡runs¡¡Heathrow£»¡¡Gatwick¡¡and¡¡Stansted£»¡¡has¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡hold¡¡on¡¡
London¡¡airports¡¯¡¡traffic¡£¡¡
Monopolies¡¡claim¡¡that¡¡without¡¡being¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡dominate¡¡their¡¡market¡¡
it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡get¡¡sufficient¡¡economies¡¡of¡¡scale¡¡to¡¡reinvest¡£¡¡
That¡¡was¡¡the¡¡argument¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡railway¡¡panies¡¡and¡¡it¡¡was¡¡BAA¡¯s¡¡
argument¡¡in¡¡2008¡¡in¡¡defending¡¡itself¡¡against¡¡the¡¡prospects¡¡of¡¡a¡¡governmentenforced¡¡
break¡­up¡£¡¡
In¡¡countries¡¡where¡¡monopolies¡¡are¡¡seen¡¡as¡¡being¡¡detrimental£»¡¡bodies¡¡exist¡¡
to¡¡regulate¡¡the¡¡market¡¡to¡¡prevent¡¡them¡¡being¡¡too¡¡powerful¡£¡¡The¡¡UK¡¡has¡¡
the¡¡petition¡¡mission¡¡£¨wwwpetition¡­mission¡£uk£©£»¡¡the¡¡
United¡¡States¡¡the¡¡Federal¡¡Trade¡¡mission¡¡£¨¡£¡£c¡£gov£©¡¡and¡¡the¡¡EU¡¡
has¡¡The¡¡European¡¡mission¡¡£¨h¡£¡£p£º//ec¡£europa¡£eu/m/petition/¡¡
index_en¡£html£©£»¡¡all¡¡keeping¡¡monopolies¡¡in¡¡check¡£¡¡A¡¡duopoly¡¡is£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡name¡¡
would¡¡suggest£»¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡form¡¡of¡¡monopoly¡¡with¡¡only¡¡two¡¡firms¡¡in¡¡the¡¡
market¡£¡¡
Oligopoly¡¡
This¡¡is¡¡where¡¡between¡¡3¡¡and¡¡20¡¡large¡¡firms¡¡dominate¡¡a¡¡market£»¡¡or¡¡where¡¡
4¡¡or¡¡5¡¡firms¡¡share¡¡more¡¡than¡¡40¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡market¡£¡¡The¡¡danger¡¡for¡¡
consumers¡¡and¡¡suppliers¡¡alike¡¡is¡¡that¡¡these¡¡dominant¡¡firms¡¡can¡¡control¡¡
the¡¡market£»¡¡to¡¡their¡¡disadvantage¡£¡¡Supermarket¡¡chains¡¡in¡¡the¡¡UK£»¡¡airlines£»¡¡
oil¡¡exploration¡¡and¡¡refining¡¡businesses¡¡the¡¡world¡¡over¡¡operate¡¡as¡¡virtual¡¡
oligopolies¡£¡¡Fr

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨1£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ