lecture02-第4章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！









＇12＇　Feuilles　detachees；　pp。　394…398　（abridged）。















Surely　all　the　usual　associations　of　the　word　〃religion〃　would



have　to　be　stripped　away　if　such　a　systematic　parti　pris　of　irony



were　also　to　be　denoted　by　the　name。　　For　common　men　〃religion；〃



whatever　more　special　meanings　it　may　have；　signifies　always　a



SERIOUS　state　of　mind。　　If　any　one　phrase　could　gather　its



universal　message；　that　phrase　would　be；　〃All　is　not　vanity　in



this　Universe；　whatever　the　appearances　may　suggest。〃　　If　it　can



stop　anything；　religion　as　commonly　apprehended　can　stop　just



such　chaffing　talk　as　Renan's。　　It　favors　gravity；　not　pertness；



it　says　〃hush〃　to　all　vain　chatter　and　smart　wit。







But　if　hostile　to　light　irony；　religion　is　equally　hostile　to



heavy　grumbling　and　complaint。　　The　world　appears　tragic　enough



in　some　religions；　but　the　tragedy　is　realized　as　purging；　and　a



way　of　deliverance　is　held　to　exist。　We　shall　see　enough　of　the



religious　melancholy　in　a　future　lecture；　but　melancholy；



according　to　our　ordinary　use　of　language；　forfeits　all　title　to



be　called　religious　when；　in　Marcus　Aurelius's　racy　words；　the



sufferer　simply　lies　kicking　and　screaming　after　the　fashion　of　a



sacrificed　pig。　　The　mood　of　a　Schopenhauer　or　a　Nietzscheand



in　a　less　degree　one　may　sometimes　say　the　same　of　our　own　sad



Carlylethough　often　an　ennobling　sadness；　is　almost　as　often



only　peevishness　running　away　with　the　bit　between　its　teeth。　



The　sallies　of　the　two　German　authors　remind　one；　half　the　time；



of　the　sick　shriekings　of　two　dying　rats。　　They　lack　the



purgatorial　note　which　religious　sadness　gives　forth。







There　must　be　something　solemn；　serious；　and　tender　about　any



attitude　which　we　denominate　religious。　　If　glad；　it　must　not



grin　or　snicker；　if　sad；　it　must　not　scream　or　curse。　　It　is



precisely　as　being　SOLEMN　experiences　that　I　wish　to　interest　you



in　religious　experiences。　　So　I　proposearbitrarily　again；　if



you　pleaseto　narrow　our　definition　once　more　by　saying　that　the



word　〃divine；〃　as　employed　therein；　shall　mean　for　us　not　merely



the　primal　and　enveloping　and　real；　for　that　meaning　if　taken



without　restriction　might　prove　too　broad。　　The　divine　shall　mean



for　us　only　such　a　primal　reality　as　the　individual　feels



impelled　to　respond　to　solemnly　and　gravely；　and　neither　by　a



curse　nor　a　jest。







But　solemnity；　and　gravity；　and　all　such　emotional　attributes；



admit　of　various　shades；　and；　do　what　we　will　with　our　defining；



the　truth　must　at　last　be　confronted　that　we　are　dealing　with　a



field　of　experience　where　there　is　not　a　single　conception　that



can　be　sharply　drawn。　　The　pretension；　under　such　conditions；　to



be　rigorously　〃scientific〃　or　〃exact〃　in　our　terms　would　only



stamp　us　as　lacking　in　understanding　of　our　task。　　Things　are



more　or　less　divine；　states　of　mind　are　more　or　less　religious；



reactions　are　more　or　less　total；　but　the　boundaries　are　always



misty；　and　it　is　everywhere　a　question　of　amount　and　degree。　



Nevertheless；　at　their　extreme　of　development；　there　can　never　be



any　question　as　to　what　experiences　are　religious。　　The　divinity



of　the　object　and　the　solemnity　of　the　reaction　are　too　well



marked　for　doubt。　　Hesitation　as　to　whether　a　state　of　mind　is



〃religious；〃　or　〃irreligious；〃　or　〃moral；〃　or　〃philosophical；〃　is



only　likely　to　arise　when　the　state　of　mind　is　weakly



characterized；　but　in　that　case　it　will　be　hardly　worthy　of　our



study　at　all。　　With　states　that　can　only　by　courtesy　be　called



religious　we　need　have　nothing　to　do；　our　only　profitable



business　being　with　what　nobody　can　possibly　feel　tempted　to　call



anything　else。　　I　said　in　my　former　lecture　that　we　learn　most



about　a　thing　when　we　view　it　under　a　microscope；　as　it　were；　or



in　its　most　exaggerated　form。　　This　is　as　true　of　religious



phenomena　as　of　any　other　kind　of　fact。　　The　only　cases　likely　to



be　profitable　enough　to　repay　our　attention　will　therefore　be



cases　where　the　religious　spirit　is　unmistakable　and　extreme。　



Its　fainter　manifestations　we　may　tranquilly　pass　by。　　Here；　for



example；　is　the　total　reaction　upon　life　of　Frederick　Locker



Lampson；　whose　autobiography；　entitled　　〃Confidences；〃　proves　him



to　have　been　a　most　amiable　man。







〃I　am　so　far　resigned　to　my　lot　that　I　feel　small　pain　at　the



thought　of　having　to　part　from　what　has　been　called　the　pleasant



habit　of　existence；　the　sweet　fable　of　life。　　I　would　not　care　to



live　my　wasted　life　over　again；　and　so　to　prolong　my　span。　



Strange　to　say；　I　have　but　little　wish　to　be　younger。　　I　submit



with　a　chill　at　my　heart。　　I　humbly　submit　because　it　is　the



Divine　Will；　and　my　appointed　destiny。　　I　dread　the　increase　of



infirmities　that　will　make　me　a　burden　to　those　around　me；　those



dear　to　me。　　No！　let　me　slip　away　as　quietly　and　comfortably　as　I



can。　　Let　the　end　come；　if　peace　come　with　it。







〃I　do　not　know　that　there　is　a　great　deal　to　be　said　for　this



world；　or　our　sojourn　here　upon　it；　but　it　has　pleased　God　so　to



place　us；　and　it　must　please　me　also。　　I　ask　you；　what　is　human



life？　　Is　not　it　a　maimed　happinesscare　and　weariness；



weariness　and　care；　with　the　baseless　expectation；　the　strange



cozenage　of　a　brighter　to…morrow？　　At　best　it　is　but　a　froward



child；　that　must　be　played　with　and　humored；　to　keep　it　quiet



till　it　falls　asleep；　and　then　the　care　is　over。〃＇13＇







＇13＇　Op。　cit。；　pp。　314；　313。















This　is　a　complex；　a　tender；　a　submissive；　and　a　graceful　state



of　mind。　　For　myself；　I　should　have　no　objection　to　calling　it　on



the　whole　a　religious　state　of　mind；　although　I　dare　say　that　to



many　of　you　it　may　seem　too　listless　and　half…hearted　to　merit　so



good　a　name。　　But　what　matters　it　in　the　end　whether　we　call　such



a　state　of　mind　religious　or　not？　　It　is　too　insignificant　for



our　instruction　in　any　case；　and　its　very　possessor　wrote　it　down



in　terms　which　he　would　not　have　used　unless　he　had　been　thinking



of　more　energetically　religious　moods　in　others；　with　which　he



found　himself　unable　to　compete。　　It　is　with　these　more　energetic



states　that　our　sole　business　lies；　and　we　can　perfectly　well



afford　to　let　the　minor　notes　and　the　uncertain　border　go。　　It



was　the　extremer　cases　that　I　had　in　mind　a　little　while　ago



when　I　said　that　personal　religion；　even　without　theology　or



ritual；　would　prove　to　embody　some　elements　that　morality　pure



and　simple　does　not　contain。　　You　may　remember　that　I　promised



shortly　to　point　out　what　those　elements　were。　　In　a　general　way



I　can　now　say　what　I　had　in　mind。







〃I　accept　the　universe〃　is　reported　to　have　been　a　favorite



utterance　of　our　New　England　transcendentalist；　Margaret　Fuller；



and　when　some　one　repeated　this　phrase　to　Thomas　Carlyle；　his



sardonic　comment　is　said　to　have　been：　　〃Gad！　she'd　better！〃　　At



bottom　the　whole　concern　of　both　morality　and　religion　is　with



the　manner　of　our　acceptance　of　the　universe。　　Do　we　accept　it



only　in　part　and　grudgingly；　or　heartily　and　altogether？　　Shall



our　protests　against　certain　things　in　it　be　radical　and



unforgiving；　or　shall　we　think　that；　even　with　evil；　there　are



ways　of　living　that　must　lead　to　good？　　If　we　accept　the　whole；



shall　we　do　so　as　if　stunned　into　submissionas　Carlyle　would



have　us〃Gad！　we'd　better！〃or　shall　we　do　so　with　enthusiastic



assent？　　Morality　pure　and　simple　accepts　the　law　of　the　whole



which　it　finds　reigning；　so　far　as　to　acknowledge　and　obey　it；



but　it　may　obey　it　with　the　heav