pale blue dot -carl sagan-第69章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


Likewise　if　you　live　on　the　surface　of　Mars　in　the　throes　of　terraforming；　or　Venus；　or　Titan。　This　strategy—breaking　up　into　many　smaller　self…propagating　groups；　each　with　somewhat　different　strengths　and　concerns；　but　all　marked　by　local　pride—has　been　widely　employed　in　the　evolution　of　life　on　Earth；　and　by　our　own　ancestors　in　particular。　It　may；　in　fact；　be　key　to　understanding　why　we　humans　are　the　way　we　are。*　This　is　the　second　of　the　missing　justifications　for　a　permanent　human　presence　in　space：　to　improve　our　chances　of　surviving；　not　just　the　catastrophes　we　can　foresee；　but　also　the　ones　we　cannot。　Gott　also　argues　that　establishing　human　munities　on　other　worlds　may　offer　us　our　best　chance　of　beating　the　odds。

*　Cf。　Shadows　of　Forgotten　Ancestors：　A　Search　for　Who　We　Are；　by　Carl　Sagan　and　Ann　Druyan　（New　York：　Random　House；　1992）。

To　take　out　this　insurance　policy　is　not　very　expensive；　not　on　the　scale　on　which　we　do　things　on　Earth。　It　would　not　even　require　doubling　the　space　budgets　of　the　present　spacefaring　nations　（which；　in　all　cases；　are　only　a　small　fraction　of　the　military　budgets　and　many　other　voluntary　expenditures　that　might　be　considered　marginal　or　even　frivolous）。　We　could　soon　be　setting　humans　down　on　near…Earth　asteroids　and　establishing　bases　on　Mars。　We　know　how　to　do　it；　even　with　present　technology；　in　less　than　a　human　lifetime。　And　the　technologies　will　quickly　improve。　We　will　get　better　at　going　into　space。

A　serious　effort　to　send　humans　to　other　worlds　is　relatively　so　inexpensive　on　a　per　annum　basis　that　it　cannot　seriously　pete　with　urgent　social　agendas　on　Earth。　If　we　take　this　path；　streams　of　images　from　other　worlds　will　be　pouring　down　on　Earth　at　the　speed　of　light。　Virtual　reality　will　make　the　adventure　accessible　to　millions　of　stay…on…Earths。　Vicarious　participation　will　be　much　more　real　than　at　any　earlier　age　of　exploration　and　discovery。　And　the　more　cultures　and　people　it　inspires　and　excites；　the　more　likely　it　will　happen。

But　by　what　right；　we　might　ask　ourselves；　do　we　inhabit；　alter；　and　conquer　other　worlds？　If　anyone　else　were　living　in　the　Solar　System；　this　would　be　an　important　question。　If；　though；　there's　no　one　else　in　this　system　but　us；　don't　we　have　a　right　to　settle　it？

Of　course；　our　exploration　and　homesteading　should　be　enlightened　by　a　respect　for　planetary　environments　and　the　scientific　knowledge　they　hold。　This　is　simple　prudence。　Of　course；　exploration　and　settlement　ought　to　be　done　equitably　and　transnationally；　by　representatives　of　the　entire　human　species。　Our　past　colonial　history　is　not　encouraging　in　these　regards；　but　this　time　we　are　not　motivated　by　gold　or　spices　or　slaves　or　a　zeal　to　convert　the　heathen　to　the　One　True　Faith；　as　were　the　European　explorers　of　the　fifteenth　and　sixteenth　centuries。　Indeed；　this　is　one　of　the　chief　reasons　we're　experiencing　such　intermittent　progress；　so　many　fits　and　starts　in　the　manned　space　programs　of　all　nations。

Despite　all　the　provincialisms　I　plained　about　early　in　this　book；　here　I　find　myself　an　unapologetic　human　chauvinist。　If　there　were　other　life　in　this　solar　system；　it　would　be　in　imminent　danger　because　the　humans　are　ing。　In　such　a　case；　I　might　even　be　persuaded　that　safeguarding　our　species　by　settling　certain　other　worlds　is　offset；　in　part　at　least；　by　the　danger　we　would　pose　to　everybody　else。　But　as　nearly　as　we　can　tell；　so　far　at　least；　there　is　no　other　life　in　this　system；　not　one　microbe。　There's　only　Earthlife。

In　that　case；　on　behalf　of　Earthlife；　I　urge　that；　with　full　knowledge　of　our　limitations；　we　vastly　increase　our　knowledge　of　the　Solar　System　and　then　begin　to　settle　other　worlds。

These　are　the　missing　practical　arguments：　safeguarding　'the　Earth　from　otherwise　inevitable　catastrophic　impacts　and　hedging　our　bets　on　the　many　other　threats；　known　and　unknown；　to　the　environment　that　sustains　us。　Without　these　arguments；　a　pelling　case　for　sending　humans　to　Mars　and　elsewhere　might　be　lacking。　But　with　them—and　the　buttressing　arguments　involving　science；　education；　perspective；　and　hope—I　think　a　strong　case　can　be　made。　If　our　long…term　survival　is　at　stake；　we　have　a　basic　responsibility　to　our　species　venture　to　other　worlds。

Sailors　on　a　becalmed　sea；　we　sense　the　stirring　of　a　breeze。




CHAPTER　22　　　TIPTOEING　THROUGH　THE　MILKY　WAY

　

　

I　swear　by　the　shelters　of　the　stars　（a　mighty　oath；　if　you　but　knew　it）　。　。　。

—THE　QUR'AN；　SURA　56　（7TH　CENTURY）

The　prospect　of　scaling　heaven；　of　ascending　to　the　sky；　of　altering　other　worlds　to　suit　our　purposes—no　matter　how　well　intentioned　we　may　be—sets　the　warning　flags　flying：　We　remember　the　human　inclination　toward　overweening　pride；　we　recall　our　fallibility　and　misjudgments　when　presented　with　powerful　new　technologies。　We　recollect　the　story　of　the　Tower　of　Babel；　a　building　〃whose　top　may　reach　unto　heaven；〃　and　God's　fear　。shout　our　species；　that　now　〃nothing　will　be　restrained　from　them　which　they　have　imagined　to　do。〃

We　e　upon　Psalm　15；　which　stakes　a　divine　claim　to　other　worlds：　〃＇T＇he　heavens　are　the　Lord's；　but　the　Earth　lath　he　given　to　the　children　of　men。〃　Or　Plato's　retelling　of　the　Greek　analogue　of　Babel—the　tale　of　Otys　and　Ephialtes。　They　were　mortals　who　〃dared　to　scale　heaven。〃　The　gods　were　faced　with　a　choice。　Should　they　kill　the　upstart　humans　〃and　annihilate　＇their＇　race　with　thunderbolts〃？　On　the　one　Band；　〃this　would　be　the　end　of　the　sacrifices　and　worship　which　mien　offered〃　the　gods　and　which　gods　craved。　〃But；　on　the　other　hand；　the　gods　could　not　suffer　＇such＇　insolence　to　be　unrestrained。''

If；　in　the　long　term；　though；　we　have　no　alternative；　if　our　choice　really　is　many　worlds　or　none；　we　are　in　need　of　other　sorts　of　myths　of　encouragement。　They　exist。　Many　religions；　from　Hinduism　to　Gnostic　Christianity　to　Mormon　doctrine；　teach　that—as　impious　as　it　may　sound—it　is　the　goal　of　humans　to　bee　gods。　Or　consider　a　story　in　the　Jewish　Talmud　left　out　of　the　Book　of　Genesis。　（It　is　in　doubtful　accord　with　the　account　of　the　apple；　the　Tree　of　Knowledge；　the　Fall；　and　the　expulsion　from　Eden。）　In　the　Garden；　God　tells　Eve　and　Adam　that　He　has　intentionally　left　the　Universe　unfinished。　It　is　the　responsibility　of　humans；　over　countless　generations；　to　participate　with　God　in　a　〃glorious〃　experiment—〃　pleting　the　Creation。〃

The　burden　of　such　a　responsibility　is　heavy；　especially　on　so　weak　and　imperfect　a　species　as　ours；　one　with　so　unhappy　a　history。　Nothing　remotely　like　〃pletion〃　can　be　attempted　without　vastly　more　knowledge　than　we　have　today。　But　perhaps；　if　our　very　existence　is　at　stake；　we　will　find　ourselves　Able　to　rise　to　this　supreme　challenge。



ALTHOUGH　HE　DID　NOT　quite　use　any　of　the　arguments　of　the　preceding　chapter；　it　was　Robert　Goddard's　intuition　that　〃the　navigation　of　interplanetary　space　must　be　effected　to　ensure　the　continuance　of　the　race。〃　Konstantin　Tsiolkovsky　made　a　similar　judgment：

There　are　countless　planets；　like　many　island　Earths　。　。　。　Man　occupies　one　of　them。　But　why　could　he　not　avail　himself　of　others；　and　of　the　might　of　numberless　suns？　。　。　。　When　the　Sun　has　exhausted　its　energy；　it　would　be　logical　to　leave　it　and　look　for　another；　newly　kindled；　star　still　in　its　prime。

This　might　be　done　earlier；　he　suggested；　long　before　the　Sun　dies；　〃by　adventurous　souls　seeking　fresh　worlds　to　conquer。〃

But　as　I　rethink　this　whole　argument；　I'm　troubled。　Is　it　too　much　Buck　Rogers？　Does　it　demand　an　absurd　confidence　in　future　technology？　Does　it　ignore　my　own　admonitions　about　human　fallibility？　Surely　in　the　short　term　it's　biased　against　technologically　less…developed　nations。　Are　there　no　practical　alternatives　that　avoid　these　pitfalls？

All　our　self…inflicted　environmental　problems；　all　our　weapons　of　mass　destruction　are　products　of　science　and　technology。　So；　you　might　say；　let's　just　back　off　from　science　and　technology。　Let's　admit　that　these　tools　are　simply　too　hot　to　handle。　Let's　create　a　simpler　society；　in　which　no　matter　how　careless　or　short…sighted　we　are；　we're　incapable　of　altering　the　environment　on　a　global　or　even　on　a　regional　sca